CVE-2015-4935
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-4931, CVE-2015-4932, CVE-2015-4933, and CVE-2015-4934.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in the server component of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 (versions before 6.1.12.1) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted packet. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 10 indicating critical severity with low attack complexity and no authentication required.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.1.0.0= 6.1.1.0= 6.1.7.2= 6.1.8.0= 6.1.8.1= 6.1.9.0= 6.1.9.1= 6.1.10.0= 6.1.10.1= 6.1.11.0= 6.1.11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack is installedCheck for FastBack installation directories or list installed software on the system. Look for processes named fbserver, fastback, or TSMFastBack.Affected if IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack is present on the system
-
Determine the installed FastBack versionUse the FastBack version command or check the program files directory for version information. Common locations include the FastBack installation path or check Windows registry under the FastBack product key.Affected if The installed version matches any of these: 6.1.0.0, 6.1.1.0, 6.1.7.2, 6.1.8.0, 6.1.8.1, 6.1.9.0, 6.1.9.1, 6.1.10.0, 6.1.10.1, 6.1.11.0, or 6.1.11.1
-
Verify the FastBack server component is runningCheck for active processes related to FastBack server. On Windows, use Task Manager or sc query. On Unix/Linux, use ps aux | grep -i fastback.Affected if The FastBack server process is running and listening on network ports
-
Check network exposure of the FastBack serverIdentify which network interfaces and ports the FastBack server is bound to. Use netstat or similar tools to determine if the server is listening on accessible network interfaces.Affected if The FastBack server is accessible from network segments beyond the local host
You are affected if IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.11.1 is installed and the server component is running and reachable on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack to version 6.1.12.1 or later to patch the stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, consider network segmentation to restrict access to the FastBack server.
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1.12.1 or later
- 1. Identify the current installed version of IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack by checking the program version in the server console or running 'dsmiver' or 'fbmgr -version' command
- 2. Download IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack version 6.1.12.1 or later from the IBM Support Portal using the patch URL provided: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21961928
- 3. Review the IBM installation and upgrade guide for version 6.1.12.1 before proceeding
- 4. Stop the FastBack server service to ensure a clean upgrade environment
- 5. Install the version 6.1.12.1 or later upgrade package following IBM's documented upgrade procedure
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the server version after restart
- 7. Confirm the FastBack server services are running properly after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-4935 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-4935 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data