CVE-2015-5002
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IBM Host On-Demand 11.0 through 11.0.14 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Host On-Demand versions 11.0 through 11.0.14 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability where user-supplied input in crafted URLs is not properly sanitized before being rendered in web pages, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript or HTML into sessions of users who click malicious links.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.0= 11.0.1= 11.0.2= 11.0.3= 11.0.4= 11.0.5= 11.0.6= 11.0.7= 11.0.8= 11.0.9= 11.0.10= 11.0.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed IBM Host On-Demand versionLocate the IBM Host On-Demand installation and check its version information, typically found in version files or manifest within the product directoryAffected if The installed version is 11.0 through 11.0.14 (any version from 11.0 up to and including 11.0.11)
-
Confirm the web component is accessibleVerify that the IBM Host On-Demand HTTP service is running and the web interface is reachable by accessing the base URLAffected if The web interface is exposed and the version is within the affected range
-
Check for vulnerable URL parameter handlingReview web server logs or test specific endpoints that accept URL query parameters, as the vulnerability lies in parameters not being sanitized before being reflected in responsesAffected if URL parameters are reflected in the HTML response without proper encoding and the version is affected
The environment is affected if IBM Host On-Demand version 11.0 through 11.0.14 is installed and the web interface is accessible, allowing reflected XSS via unsanitized URL parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to IBM Host On-Demand 11.0.15 or later which contains the fix. As an interim measure, implement URL filtering at the web application firewall or proxy layer to detect and block XSS payloads in query parameters.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-5002 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-5002 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data