CVE-2015-5158
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c in QEMU, when built with SCSI-device emulation support, allows guest OS users with CAP_SYS_RAWIO permissions to cause a denial of service (instance crash) via an invalid opcode in a SCSI command descriptor block.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in QEMU's SCSI device emulation (hw/scsi/scsi-bus.c) when built with SCSI support. Guest OS users with CAP_SYS_RAWIO permissions can trigger the overflow by sending an invalid opcode in a SCSI command descriptor block, causing the QEMU instance to crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.2.0, < 2.4.0= 2.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify QEMU versionRun 'qemu-system-x86_64 --version' or 'qemu-img --version' to find the installed QEMU versionAffected if The version falls within 2.2.0 to 2.4.0 inclusive (>=2.2.0 and <2.4.0, or exactly 2.4.0)
-
Confirm SCSI support is compiled inCheck for the presence of scsi-bus.c or SCSI-related files in the QEMU build, or run 'qemu-system-x86_64 -device ?' and look for SCSI device options like 'lsi53c895a', 'virtio-scsi-pci', or 'scsi-hd'Affected if SCSI emulation support is present in the QEMU binary
-
Determine if SCSI devices are exposed to guestsReview the QEMU command line or VM configuration file for SCSI device definitions such as '-device scsi-hd', '-device scsi-cd', or '-device virtio-scsi-pci'Affected if A SCSI controller or disk is passed to the guest VM (this is the attack surface)
-
Verify guest has CAP_SYS_RAWIO capabilityFor QEMU instances using libvirt, run 'virsh dumpxml <vmname>' and check the <capabilities> section; for raw QEMU, check if the -enable-kvm flag is used with unprivileged guestsAffected if The guest OS runs with elevated privileges or has CAP_SYS_RAWIO capability exposed to it
You are affected if your QEMU version is between 2.2.0 and 2.4.0 inclusive, the SCSI subsystem is compiled into your QEMU binary, and a SCSI device is currently passed to a guest VM with elevated privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.4.0
Update QEMU to a patched version. Additionally, restrict CAP_SYS_RAWIO permissions for guest users and avoid exposing SCSI emulation to untrusted guests as a defense-in-depth measure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-5158 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-5158 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data