SafariWeb browser · Apple

CVE-2015-7099

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2015-12-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 9.1 or later.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
WebKit in Apple iOS before 9.2, Safari before 9.0.2, and tvOS before 9.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted web site, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7048, CVE-2015-7095, CVE-2015-7096, CVE-2015-7097, CVE-2015-7098, CVE-2015-7100, CVE-2015-7101, CVE-2015-7102, and CVE-2015-7103.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

WebKit contains a memory corruption vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service via a crafted website. The vulnerability affects iOS devices before version 9.2, Safari browsers before 9.0.2, and tvOS devices before version 9.1.

MitigationApply vendor patches by updating iOS to 9.2 or later, Safari to 9.0.2 or later, and tvOS to 9.1 or later across all affected devices.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SafariWeb browser
Affected:<= 9.0.1
TvosOperating system
Affected:<= 9.0
Iphone OsOperating system
Affected:<= 9.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Apple device type
    Determine whether the device is a Mac running Safari, an iPhone/iPad running iOS, or an Apple TV running tvOS. This dictates which version check to perform next.
    Affected if Device is a Mac, iPhone, iPad, or Apple TV using Safari, iOS, or tvOS respectively.
  2. Check Safari version on macOS
    Open Safari, click Safari in the menu bar, select About Safari. The version number appears next to the Safari logo. Compare it to the affected range: versions 9.0.1 and earlier are vulnerable.
    Affected if Safari version is 9.0.1 or earlier on macOS.
  3. Check iOS version on iPhone or iPad
    Open Settings app, tap General, tap About. The version number is shown next to Version. Compare it to the affected range: iOS versions 9.1 and earlier are vulnerable.
    Affected if iOS version is 9.1 or earlier on iPhone or iPad.
  4. Check tvOS version on Apple TV
    On Apple TV, go to Settings > General > About. The tvOS version is displayed. Compare it to the affected range: tvOS versions 9.0 and earlier are vulnerable.
    Affected if tvOS version is 9.0 or earlier on Apple TV.
  5. Verify WebKit-based browsing is enabled
    Confirm that Safari or any WebKit-based browser is installed and functional on the device. The vulnerability is triggered by visiting a crafted website, so browsing capability must be present.
    Affected if Safari or a WebKit-based browser is installed and can access websites.

A user is affected if they are running Safari 9.0.1 or earlier on macOS, iOS 9.1 or earlier on iPhone/iPad, or tvOS 9.0 or earlier on Apple TV, and have web browsing functionality enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 9.1
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor patches by updating iOS to 9.2 or later, Safari to 9.0.2 or later, and tvOS to 9.1 or later across all affected devices.

Fix this in Safari Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7099 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7099 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data