OpenshiftApplication · Redhat

CVE-2015-7537

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-02-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.1 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that have unspecified impact via vectors related to the HTTP GET method.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins versions before 1.640 and LTS before 1.625.2 allows remote attackers to hijack administrator authentication sessions by tricking admin users into making HTTP GET requests to malicious URLs, potentially enabling unauthorized administrative actions on the Jenkins server.

MitigationUpgrade Jenkins to version 1.640 or later (or LTS 1.625.2 or later). Additionally, ensure the built-in CSRF protection (crumb default) remains enabled and verify no custom configurations disable it.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OpenshiftApplication
Affected:<= 3.1= 2.0
JenkinsApplication
Affected:<= 1.625.1<= 1.639

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine Jenkins version via HTTP API
    Send a GET request to the Jenkins server root endpoint (e.g., http://yourjenkins/api/json or /api/xml) and locate the 'version' field in the JSON response. Alternatively, access Manage Jenkins > About Jenkins to view the version number displayed on the UI.
    Affected if The displayed version is 1.639 or earlier, or any version before LTS 1.625.2 (such as 1.625.1, 1.625, 1.624, etc.)
  2. Identify if running Red Hat OpenShift with embedded Jenkins
    If the Jenkins instance is embedded within Red Hat OpenShift, check the OpenShift version by running 'oc version' or accessing the OpenShift web console. The embedded Jenkins version typically matches the OpenShift version.
    Affected if Running OpenShift version 2.0 or any version 3.1 and earlier that includes an embedded Jenkins instance falling within the affected version range.
  3. Verify CSRF protection (crumb) configuration status
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security. Under the 'CSRF Protection' section, confirm whether the 'Enable proxy compatibility' or default crumb implementation is enabled. Alternatively, query the API: send a GET request to /api/json?tree=useCrumbs,crumbRequestField and check the 'useCrumbs' value.
    Affected if CSRF protection is disabled (useCrumbs returns false) or no crumb is required for requests, allowing unauthenticated or tricked admin actions.

You are affected if your Jenkins version is 1.639 or earlier (or any version before LTS 1.625.2, or embedded in OpenShift 2.0/3.1 and below) AND the CSRF protection (crumb) is disabled or misconfigured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Jenkins to version 1.640 or later (or LTS 1.625.2 or later). Additionally, ensure the built-in CSRF protection (crumb default) remains enabled and verify no custom configurations disable it.

Fix this in Openshift Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-7537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-7537 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data