CVE-2015-8275
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLVRTC eParakstitajs 3.0 (1.3.0) and edoc-libraries-2.5.4_01 allow attackers to write to arbitrary files via crafted EDOC files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe eParakstitajs digital signature application (version 3.0/1.3.0) and edoc-libraries-2.5.4_01 fail to properly validate or sanitize file paths when processing EDOC electronic documents. This allows attackers to craft malicious EDOC files that can write content to arbitrary filesystem locations outside the intended working directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.5.4_01= 1.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Eparaksts software is installedLook for Eparaksts Edoc Libraries or Eparakstitajs in installed programs via Control Panel > Programs and Features, or check common installation paths such as C:\Program Files\Eparaksts or C:\Program Files (x86)\EparakstsAffected if Either Eparaksts Edoc Libraries or Eparakstitajs 3 is present on the system
-
Verify the installed version of Eparaksts Edoc LibrariesOpen Windows Registry and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Eparaksts\Edoc Libraries (or HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Eparaksts\Edoc Libraries) and check the Version value, or right-click the installed .dll or .exe file and view Properties > Details for version informationAffected if The version is exactly 2.5.4_01
-
Verify the installed version of Eparakstitajs 3Open Windows Registry and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Eparaksts\Eparakstitajs (or HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Eparaksts\Eparakstitajs) and check the Version value, or check the Properties of the main executableAffected if The version is exactly 1.3.0
-
Confirm EDOC file handling is availableCheck if the application registers file associations for .edoc files, or verify that edoc libraries DLLs (such as edocprocessor.dll or similar) exist in the installation directoryAffected if The system can process or has processed EDOC electronic documents
You are affected if Eparaksts Edoc Libraries version 2.5.4_01 or Eparakstitajs version 1.3.0 is installed and the system handles EDOC files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict path validation and directory sandboxing for file write operations in EDOC processing; avoid opening EDOC files from untrusted sources until patched.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8275 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8275 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data