CVE-2015-8276
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLVRTC eParakstitajs 3.0 (1.3.0) and edoc-libraries-2.5.4_01 allow attackers to read arbitrary files via crafted EDOC files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceLVRTC eParakstitajs 3.0 and edoc-libraries-2.5.4_01 contain a path traversal vulnerability in their EDOC file parsing functionality. Attackers can craft malicious EDOC files containing path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../) to access and read arbitrary files on the system beyond the intended directory boundaries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.5.4_01= 1.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed version of Eparaksts Edoc LibrariesLocate the edoc-libraries installation directory and check the version information file or library manifest. On Windows, this may be in the program files directory; on Linux, check /usr/lib or the application-specific directory.Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.5.4_01
-
Check installed version of Eparakstitajs 3Locate the Eparakstitajs 3 application and check its version through the application itself (Help > About), or check the version file in the installation directory.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.3.0
-
Verify EDOC file parsing is enabledCheck if the application has EDOC file import or parsing functionality enabled in its settings or configuration. Look for EDOC-related settings in the application configuration files.Affected if EDOC file parsing functionality is active and accepting input files
-
Inspect EDOC processing logs for path traversal attemptsReview application logs for any EDOC file processing events. Look for log entries containing path traversal sequences like ../ or ..\ in file paths.Affected if Logs show EDOC files containing path traversal sequences were processed without rejection
If either Eparaksts Edoc Libraries version 2.5.4_01 or Eparakstitajs 3 version 1.3.0 is installed with EDOC file parsing enabled, the environment is affected by this path traversal vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to patched versions of eParakstitajs and edoc-libraries if available, or implement strict input validation and path sanitization on EDOC file processing to reject path traversal sequences.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8276 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8276 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data