CVE-2015-8551
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe PCI backend driver in Xen, when running on an x86 system and using Linux 3.1.x through 4.3.x as the driver domain, allows local guest administrators to hit BUG conditions and cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and host OS crash) by leveraging a system with access to a passed-through MSI or MSI-X capable physical PCI device and a crafted sequence of XEN_PCI_OP_* operations, aka "Linux pciback missing sanity checks."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe PCI backend driver (pciback) in Xen for x86 systems running Linux 3.1.x-4.3.x as the driver domain lacks sanity checks when handling XEN_PCI_OP_* operations. Local guest administrators with access to passed-through MSI/MSI-X capable PCI devices can trigger NULL pointer dereferences, causing BUG conditions and host OS crashes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.1, <= 3.1.10>= 4.3.0, <= 4.3.6= 7.0= 8.0= 13.1= 11= 12= 11= 12= 11= 12= 11= 12= 12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Xen hypervisor is in useRun 'xl info' or 'xm info' or check for Xen kernel boot parameters (xen_` in uname -a output)Affected if System is not running Xen hypervisor - this vulnerability only affects Xen environments with pciback driver
-
Confirm kernel version is within affected rangeRun 'uname -r' and compare to: 3.1.x (up to 3.1.10) or 4.3.x (up to 4.3.6). Example: 'uname -r' returns 4.3.5 means affectedAffected if Kernel version is between 3.1 and 3.1.10 inclusive, or between 4.3.0 and 4.3.6 inclusive
-
Determine if PCI passthrough is enabledCheck for passed-through PCI devices in guest configurations: 'xl pci-assignable-list' or look for 'pci' device entries in guest config files under /etc/xen/Affected if Guest domains have PCI devices assigned via passthrough - the vulnerability is only exploitable when guests have access to passed-through PCI devices
-
Verify pciback driver is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep pciback' or check 'xl pci-list <guestname>' to see if any guest has access to PCI devices requiring the pciback backendAffected if pciback module is loaded and handling PCI passthrough operations for guest domains with MSI/MSI-X capable PCI devices
A system is affected if it runs Xen with a vulnerable kernel (3.1-3.1.10 or 4.3.0-4.3.6) and has guest domains with assigned PCI devices that use MSI/MSI-X interrupts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the upstream fix (sanity checks in pciback driver) by upgrading the driver domain Linux kernel to a version beyond 4.3, or apply vendor-specific patches. Alternatively, ensure untrusted guests cannot access PCI passthrough capabilities if patching is not immediately feasible.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,256.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8551 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8551 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data