CVE-2015-8776
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe strftime function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.23 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly obtain sensitive information via an out-of-range time value.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe strftime function in glibc before version 2.23 does not properly validate time values, allowing context-dependent attackers to trigger out-of-range conditions that cause application crashes (denial of service) or potentially expose sensitive information from memory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.04= 14.04= 15.10= 8.0= 23= 11= 13.2= 11= 12= 11= 12= 11= 12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed glibc versionRun 'ldd --version' or 'glibc --version' to get the glibc version numberAffected if The version shown is earlier than 2.23 (e.g., 2.22, 2.19, etc.)
-
Check glibc package version on Debian/UbuntuRun 'dpkg -l | grep libc6' on Debian/Ubuntu to see the installed glibc package versionAffected if The version is less than 2.23-0ubuntu0 or 2.23 and below
-
Check glibc version on FedoraRun 'rpm -q glibc' to query the glibc package version on FedoraAffected if The version shown is earlier than 2.23
-
Check glibc version on SUSERun 'rpm -q glibc' on SUSE systems to query the installed glibc versionAffected if The version is earlier than 2.23
-
Verify strftime usage in deployed applicationsReview application code or use 'ldd <executable>' to confirm linkage against the vulnerable glibc, then test strftime calls with out-of-range time values if possibleAffected if The application links against a glibc version earlier than 2.23 and uses strftime with user-controlled format strings
You are affected if your system runs any glibc version earlier than 2.23 and applications use the strftime function with time values that could be manipulated to cause out-of-range conditions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade glibc to version 2.23 or later to patch the strftime vulnerability, as this is a system-level library affecting all applications that use the date/time formatting functions.
glibc version 2.23 or later (or vendor-provided patch level containing the fix)
- Check current glibc version: `ldd --version` or `rpm -q glibc` / `dpkg -l libc6`
- Verify the version is below 2.23 (vulnerable)
- For Debian/Ubuntu: Run `apt-get update && apt-get install libc6` to get the fixed package
- For Fedora: Run `dnf update glibc` to apply security updates
- For openSUSE: Run `zypper update glibc` to install the patched version
- For SUSE Linux Enterprise: Run `zypper patch` or apply updates from SUSE repositories
- Reboot the system to ensure the new glibc is loaded into memory
- Verify the fix by checking glibc version again - should be 2.23 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8776 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.sourceware.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- lists.opensuse.org
- www.debian.org
- www.openwall.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www.openwall.com
- sourceware.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- www.debian.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- access.redhat.com
- security.gentoo.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8776 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data