CVE-2015-8798
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDirectory traversal vulnerability in the Management Server in Symantec Embedded Security: Critical System Protection (SES:CSP) 1.0.x before 1.0 MP5, Embedded Security: Critical System Protection for Controllers and Devices (SES:CSP) 6.5.0 before MP1, Critical System Protection (SCSP) before 5.2.9 MP6, Data Center Security: Server Advanced Server (DCS:SA) 6.x before 6.5 MP1 and 6.6 before MP1, and Data Center Security: Server Advanced Server and Agents (DCS:SA) through 6.6 MP1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDirectory traversal vulnerability in the Management Server of multiple Symantec security products (SES:CSP, SCSP, DCS:SA) allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code by manipulating file paths through unspecified vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.2.9= 6.5.0= 6.6.0<= 6.6.0<= 1.0<= 6.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Symantec security productInspect the system for installed software matching the affected product names: Symantec Critical System Protection, Symantec Data Center Security Server, or Symantec Embedded Security Critical System Protection. Check program files directories or use system inventory tools to list security software.Affected if Any of these products are found installed on the system
-
Determine product versionLocate the version information for the installed product. Common methods include: checking the software's About/Help dialog, reviewing version info in installation directories, or querying the Windows registry under HKLM\Software\Symantec\ or similar keys.Affected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: <= 5.2.9 for SCSP, = 6.5.0 or = 6.6.0 or <= 6.6.0 for DCS, <= 1.0 for Embedded Security CSP, or <= 6.5.0 for Embedded Security CSP for Controllers
-
Verify Management Server component is activeCheck if the Management Server service is running. On Windows, use Services.msc or run 'sc query' for services named 'Symantec Management Server', 'SCSP Management Server', or similar. On Linux, check for processes like 'sescs' or 'scsp-server'.Affected if The Management Server service is running and the product version is within affected ranges
-
Confirm authenticated user access scopeReview the system's authentication configuration and user access controls for the Management Server interface. Check if the Management Server web console or API is accessible and accepts authenticated sessions.Affected if The Management Server accepts authenticated connections and the product version is vulnerable
The environment is affected if any of the listed Symantec products are installed with a version within the specified ranges and the Management Server component is active and accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patches (MP5 for 1.0.x, MP1 for 6.5.0/6.6, 5.2.9 MP6 for SCSP). Until patched, restrict network access to the Management Server to trusted networks and enforce least-privilege for authenticated users.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8798 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8798 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data