CVE-2015-8799
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDirectory traversal vulnerability in the Management Server in Symantec Embedded Security: Critical System Protection (SES:CSP) 1.0.x before 1.0 MP5, Embedded Security: Critical System Protection for Controllers and Devices (SES:CSP) 6.5.0 before MP1, Critical System Protection (SCSP) before 5.2.9 MP6, Data Center Security: Server Advanced Server (DCS:SA) 6.x before 6.5 MP1 and 6.6 before MP1, and Data Center Security: Server Advanced Server and Agents (DCS:SA) through 6.6 MP1 allows remote authenticated users to write update-package data to arbitrary agent locations via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDirectory traversal vulnerability in the Management Server component of multiple Symantec security products (SES:CSP, SCSP, DCS:SA). Authenticated remote users can write update-package data to arbitrary filesystem locations by manipulating file paths with traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../'), bypassing intended path restrictions in the update mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.2.9>= 6.0.0, < 6.5.0= 6.5.0= 6.6.0= 6.6.0<= 1.0= 6.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Symantec productLocate the installed security product by checking installed programs or running 'sc query' for services related to 'Symantec', 'SCSP', 'DCS', or 'SES'Affected if The product is one of: Symantec Critical System Protection, Symantec Data Center Security Server, or Symantec Embedded Security Critical System Protection
-
Determine Management Server versionCheck the Management Server component version - typically found in the program files directory, in an 'about' or 'version' file, or via the management console's version information panelAffected if Version is 5.2.9 or lower for SES:CSP, 6.0.0 through 6.6.0 (inclusive) for DCS:SA, 1.0 or lower for Embedded Security CSP, or exactly 6.5.0 for Embedded Security CSP For Controllers
-
Verify Management Server is accessibleConfirm the Management Server service is running and network-accessible. Check if the management port (typically 443 or 8443) is listeningAffected if The Management Server service is running and exposed to network users (especially untrusted or external networks)
-
Confirm update mechanism is enabledCheck the management server configuration for update package functionality. This may be in the console under 'Updates', 'Policy', or 'Server Settings'Affected if Update mechanism or auto-update feature is enabled and configurable by authenticated users
-
Review user access controlsAudit accounts with permissions to upload or configure update packages in the Management Server console. Look for non-admin or untrusted accounts with update privilegesAffected if There are authenticated users with update package privileges who are not fully trusted or verified
A user is affected if they have any of the listed product versions installed with the Management Server component running and accessible, particularly if untrusted or less-privileged users have access to the update configuration feature.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data6.5.0
Apply vendor patches: MP5 for SES:CSP 1.0.x, MP1 for SES:CSP 6.5.0 and DCS:SA 6.x/6.6, MP6 for SCSP 5.2.x. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict management server administrative access to only trusted, verified users and implement file integrity monitoring on agent directories to detect unauthorized write operations.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-8799 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-8799 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data