CVE-2015-9118
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, SD 400, SD 410/12, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 800, SD 808, and SD 810, in ADSP's QDI Root-PD driver, untrusted arguments from User PD may cause integer overflow resulting in buffer overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon ADSP QDI Root-PD driver where untrusted arguments from User Protection Domain cause integer overflow, leading to buffer overflow. This is a critical flaw in the Application Digital Signal Processor driver affecting multiple Snapdragon chipset generations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use system commands (e.g., 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Android, or check 'Settings > About Phone' > 'Chipset' or 'Model' information) to determine the Qualcomm Snapdragon SoC model numberAffected if The chipset matches any of these: Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Sd 400, Sd 410, Sd 412, Sd 615, or Sd 616
-
Verify ADSP firmware versionOn Android devices, use 'adb shell' and check ADSP firmware version via 'cat /sys/kernel/debug/firmware_agent/adsp*' or consult the device's baseband/ADSP firmware information through OEM diagnostic toolsAffected if The ADSP firmware version cannot be verified as patched, or shows a version prior to the OTA fix
-
Check Android security patch levelOn Android devices, go to 'Settings > About Phone > Software Information' and look for 'Android security patch level' or use 'adb shell getprop ro.build.version.security_patch'Affected if The security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05, indicating the firmware update has not been applied
-
Confirm QDI Root-PD driver presenceExamine the ADSP driver subsystem through 'ls /sys/kernel/debug/qdi/' or check ADSP subsystem logs for the QDI Root-PD driver component if accessibleAffected if The QDI Root-PD driver is present and the firmware has not been updated to address the integer overflow vulnerability
If the device uses an affected Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset (Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Sd 400, Sd 410, Sd 412, Sd 615, or Sd 616) and the Android security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05 or the ADSP firmware is unverified, the device is likely affected by CVE-2015-9118.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later; this is a firmware-level fix requiring OTA update from the device OEM. No workarounds available for end users.
Android Security Patch Level April 5, 2018 or later (contact OEM for device-specific firmware update)
- Verify the current Android security patch level on the device (Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level)
- If the Security Patch Level is earlier than April 5, 2018, check with the device manufacturer (OEM) for available firmware updates that include the fix for CVE-2015-9118
- Apply the OEM-provided system update that includes the Android Security Patch Level of April 5, 2018 or later
- After updating, verify that the Security Patch Level reflects April 5, 2018 or a later date
- If no update is available from the OEM, consider replacing the device with a model that has received the security patch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,128.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2015-9118 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2015-9118 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data