CVE-2017-18329
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPossible Buffer overflow when transmitting an RTP packet in snapdragon automobile and snapdragon wear in versions MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8909W, MSM8996AU, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 625, SD 636, SD 650/52, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 810, SD 820, SD 835, SD 845 / SD 850, SDA660, SDM630, SDM660, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, SXR1130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in RTP (Real-time Transport Protocol) packet transmission code within Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset firmware. The flaw allows potential code execution or denial of service when processing malformed RTP packets, affecting multiple mobile and automotive processor variants.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelDetermine the specific Qualcomm Snapdragon or modem chipset present in the device. This can be done by reviewing device hardware specifications, using system information commands (such as 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Android or checking BIOS/UEFI information), or reviewing device documentation. Match the chipset identifier against the list: Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, or Msm8909w.Affected if The device contains any of the following chipsets: Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, or Msm8909w.
-
Verify firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version of the identified Qualcomm chipset. On mobile devices, this is typically found in Settings > About Phone > Build Number, or via AT commands on modem interfaces (such as 'AT+CGMR' or 'AT+QMSV'). Compare the installed firmware version against the affected product list.Affected if The chipset firmware is any version of the listed affected products (all versions are impacted).
-
Confirm RTP functionality is enabledDetermine whether the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) is in use on the device. Check if VoIP, video conferencing, streaming applications, or other services that utilize RTP are installed and active. Review network configuration for RTP port usage (typically ports 5000-6000 UDP/RTP). Inspect running processes for RTP-related services.Affected if RTP packet processing is enabled or any application utilizing RTP is active on the device.
-
Assess network exposureEvaluate whether the device is exposed to untrusted networks where malformed RTP packets could be received. Check firewall rules, network segmentation, and whether the device communicates over public networks or receives RTP traffic from external sources. Review inbound UDP port configurations.Affected if The device can receive RTP packets from untrusted or external network sources.
A user is affected if their device contains any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Mdm9650, Mdm9655, or Msm8909w) and has RTP functionality enabled with potential network exposure to malformed RTP packets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Qualcomm firmware/security patches for affected Snapdragon versions; implement input validation on RTP packet handlers; restrict network exposure of affected devices where possible.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-18329 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-18329 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data