MessagesightApplication · Ibm

CVE-2016-0375

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-07-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
JMS Client in IBM MessageSight 1.1.x through 1.1.0.1, 1.2.x through 1.2.0.3, and 2.0.x through 2.0.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to obtain administrator privileges for executing arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The JMS Client component in IBM MessageSight contains a privilege escalation vulnerability affecting versions 1.1.x through 1.1.0.1, 1.2.x through 1.2.0.3, and 2.0.x through 2.0.0.0. An authenticated remote user can obtain administrator privileges through unspecified vectors, enabling execution of arbitrary commands on the affected system.

MitigationApply IBM security patches for MessageSight versions 1.1.0.2, 1.2.0.4, 2.0.0.1 or later. As an interim control, restrict network access to the JMS Client interface to trusted authenticated users only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MessagesightApplication
Affected:= 1.1.0.0= 1.1.0.1= 1.2= 1.2.0.0= 1.2.0.1= 1.2.0.2= 1.2.0.3= 2.0.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM MessageSight installation and version
    Locate the IBM MessageSight installation directory and check the version file or use the product's administrative interface to determine the installed version number.
    Affected if The installed version matches 1.1.0.0, 1.1.0.1, 1.2, 1.2.0.0, 1.2.0.1, 1.2.0.2, 1.2.0.3, or 2.0.0.0, or falls within the ranges 1.1.x through 1.1.0.1, 1.2.x through 1.2.0.3, or 2.0.x through 2.0.0.0.
  2. Confirm JMS Client component is enabled
    Access the IBM MessageSight administrative console or configuration files to verify whether the JMS Client interface or messaging service is actively enabled and listening for connections.
    Affected if The JMS Client component is enabled and accessible on the system.
  3. Verify authentication is configured for JMS Client
    Check the JMS Client security settings in the MessageSight configuration to determine whether authentication is required for client connections.
    Affected if JMS Client authentication is configured, as the vulnerability requires an authenticated remote user to exploit the privilege escalation.
  4. Review user privilege assignments
    Examine the MessageSight user registry and role assignments through the administrative console to identify any users with elevated privileges or unexpected administrative access.
    Affected if A non-administrative authenticated user has been granted administrator-level privileges, indicating potential exploitation.

A system is affected if it runs IBM MessageSight versions 1.1.0.0 through 1.1.0.1, 1.2.0.0 through 1.2.0.3, or 2.0.0.0 with the JMS Client component enabled and accessible to authenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM security patches for MessageSight versions 1.1.0.2, 1.2.0.4, 2.0.0.1 or later. As an interim control, restrict network access to the JMS Client interface to trusted authenticated users only.

Fix this in Messagesight Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-0375 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-0375 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data