CVE-2016-10442
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Mobile MDM9640, SDM630, MSM8976, MSM8937, SDM845, MSM8976, and MSM8952, when running module or kernel code with improper access control allowing writing to arbitrary regions of memory, the user may utilize this vector to alter module executable code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an access control vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon mobile chipset firmware (baseband/modprocessor) that allows writing to arbitrary memory regions. The improper access control permits a user to alter module executable code, potentially achieving code execution at elevated privilege levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the chipset modelRun 'getprop ro.hardware' or check /proc/cpuinfo to retrieve the chipset identifier. Alternatively, check 'getprop ro.product.board' or review the device specifications for the Snapdragon model number.Affected if The chipset matches one of these affected models: MDM9640, SDM630, MDM9650, MSM8976, MSM8937, SDM845, or MSM8952.
-
Check the baseband firmware versionRun 'getprop gsm.version.baseband' to retrieve the baseband/modem processor firmware version. On some devices, this may also appear as 'ril.baseband.version' or be accessible via AT command *#06# or *#8378# depending on the carrier.Affected if The baseband firmware is present and corresponds to an unpatched version on any of the affected chipset models listed above.
-
Verify the Android security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' to check the installed security patch date. This indicates when the device last received Android security updates.Affected if The security patch level is earlier than April 5, 2018, or the property returns empty or an older date, indicating the firmware correction has not been applied.
-
Confirm the modem processor is activeCheck that the device has cellular connectivity capability and a baseband/modem subsystem. This vulnerability exists in the modem processor firmware, so devices without cellular modems (Wi-Fi only tablets, for example) are not affected.Affected if The device has an active cellular modem using one of the affected Qualcomm Snapdragon baseband processors.
The device is affected if it uses any of the affected Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets (MDM9640, SDM630, MDM9650, MSM8976, MSM8937, SDM845, MSM8952) and the baseband firmware has not been updated to include the April 2018 security patch.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch released April 5, 2018 or later, which includes the corrected firmware for affected Qualcomm Snapdragon variants (MDM9640, SDM630, MSM8976, MSM8937, SDM845, MSM8952). Device OEMs must push OTA updates with the patched firmware.
Android Security Patch Level 2018-04-05 or later (contact device manufacturer for specific firmware version as fixes are delivered through carrier/manufacturer OTA updates)
- Identify the current Android security patch level on affected devices by going to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level
- Contact the device manufacturer (e.g., Samsung, LG, Google, etc.) to obtain the firmware update containing the 2018-04-05 or later Android security patch level
- Apply the manufacturer-provided OTA (Over-The-Air) update or flash the updated firmware
- Verify the security patch level has been updated to 2018-04-05 or later by checking Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level
- For enterprise or embedded deployments, ensure the Qualcomm firmware blobs are also updated to versions containing the access control fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,896.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10442 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10442 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data