CVE-2016-10486
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Android before 2018-04-05 or earlier security patch level on Qualcomm Snapdragon Automobile and Snapdragon Mobile MDM9640, MDM9645, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 450, SD 617, SD 625, SD 650/52, SD 808, SD 810, SD 820, and SD 820A, PD failure reason string from user PD is used directly in root PD, so if the buffer parameter is non-NULL terminated in Diag F3 APIs, a buffer overread occurs.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overread vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon processors' Diag F3 APIs where a PD failure reason string from user PD is passed directly to root PD without proper NULL termination validation, causing out-of-bounds read when the buffer parameter is non-NULL terminated.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Snapdragon processor modelCheck the device specifications or use commands like 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Android devices to identify the Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset model number (e.g., Mdm9640, Sd 625)Affected if The identified model matches any of these: Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 450, Sd 617, Sd 625
-
Verify firmware version is in affected rangeQuery the firmware version through device diagnostics or system information screens. The exact method varies by device manufacturer but is typically found in 'About Phone' or through Qualcomm's diagnostic toolsAffected if The device firmware is any version of the affected Snapdragon models listed (all versions are affected)
-
Confirm Diag F3 API feature is in useDetermine if the device uses Diag (Diagnostic) F3 API functionality. This is typically used by carrier diagnostic tools, debugging services, or manufacturer test modes. Check running services or installed diagnostic packagesAffected if The device has Diag F3 API functionality enabled and actively used, as the vulnerability triggers when processing PD failure reason strings through this interface
-
Check Android security patch levelOn Android devices, go to Settings > About Phone > Build Number or use 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' command to see the installed security patch levelAffected if The security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05, indicating the vulnerability has not been addressed
The device is affected if it contains any of the listed Qualcomm Snapdragon models (Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Sd 210, Sd 212, Sd 205, Sd 450, Sd 617, Sd 625) with any firmware version AND the Android security patch level is earlier than 2018-04-05.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Android security patch level 2018-04-05 or later, which addresses this vulnerability in affected Snapdragon Mobile and Automobile processors.
Android Security Patch Level 2018-04-05 or later (specific to device manufacturer/carrier)
- Check current Android security patch level on the device by navigating to Settings > About Phone > Software Info > Security patch level
- If the security patch level is earlier than April 5, 2018, the device is vulnerable
- Contact the device manufacturer or mobile carrier for the available Android security update containing the April 2018 patch level or later
- Apply the available Android security update through Settings > System > Software Update > Check for Updates
- After updating, verify the security patch level now shows April 5, 2018 or later in Settings > About Phone > Software Info > Security patch level
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10486 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10486 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data