Linux KernelOperating system · Linux

CVE-2016-10723

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-06-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.17.2 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 4.17.2. Since the page allocator does not yield CPU resources to the owner of the oom_lock mutex, a local unprivileged user can trivially lock up the system forever by wasting CPU resources from the page allocator (e.g., via concurrent page fault events) when the global OOM killer is invoked. NOTE: the software maintainer has not accepted certain proposed patches, in part because of a viewpoint that "the underlying problem is non-trivial to handle.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Linux kernel page allocator fails to yield CPU resources to the owner of the oom_lock mutex when the global OOM killer is invoked. A local unprivileged user can exploit this by triggering concurrent page fault events to consume all available CPU resources, causing a permanent system lockup (Denial of Service).

MitigationApply kernel updates if available; otherwise, mitigate via cgroup resource limits, restricting local user access, or kernel parameter tuning to limit OOM-triggered behavior. The upstream fix is complex and has not been accepted by maintainers.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Linux KernelOperating system
Affected:<= 4.17.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify kernel version
    Run `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to get the running kernel version
    Affected if The version is 4.17.2 or earlier (e.g., 4.17.0, 4.16.x, 4.15.x, etc.)
  2. Check if OOM killer is enabled
    Check the OOM configuration: `cat /proc/sys/vm/panic_on_oom` (0 = OOM killer enabled, 1 or 2 = disabled)
    Affected if The value is 0, meaning the OOM killer is active and the vulnerable code path can be triggered
  3. Verify overcommit memory settings
    Check memory overcommit behavior: `cat /proc/sys/vm/overcommit_memory`. A value of 0 (default) or 1 allows overcommit, increasing the chance of OOM conditions
    Affected if Overcommit is enabled (0 or 1), which makes OOM triggers more likely
  4. Assess local user access
    Check for the presence of unprivileged accounts using `grep '^[^:]*:[^:]*:[0-9]' /etc/passwd` or by confirming multi-user functionality with `who`
    Affected if Unprivileged local users exist and can execute processes, providing a vector to trigger the vulnerable code path

A system is affected if it runs Linux Kernel 4.17.2 or earlier, has the OOM killer enabled, and permits unprivileged local user access, allowing the oom_lock mutex bug to be exploited for CPU exhaustion.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.17.2
Interim mitigation

Apply kernel updates if available; otherwise, mitigate via cgroup resource limits, restricting local user access, or kernel parameter tuning to limit OOM-triggered behavior. The upstream fix is complex and has not been accepted by maintainers.

Fix this in Linux Kernel Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation32.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA12.0 h
66.0 hours of engineering $11,520
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $18,432.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-10723 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-10723 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data