CVE-2016-1335
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SSH implementation in Cisco StarOS before 19.3.M0.62771 and 20.x before 20.0.M0.62768 on ASR 5000 devices mishandles a multi-user public-key authentication configuration, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges by establishing a connection from an endpoint that was previously used for an administrator's connection, aka Bug ID CSCux22492.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe SSH implementation in Cisco StarOS before versions 19.3.M0.62771 and 20.x before 20.0.M0.62768 on ASR 5000 devices has a privilege escalation vulnerability in multi-user public-key authentication. Authenticated users can gain elevated (administrator) privileges by reconnecting from an endpoint (IP address) that was previously used for an administrator's SSH session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 16.5.2= 17.7.0= 18.4.0= 19.0.1= 19.3.0= 20.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify StarOS version on the ASR 5000Run 'show version' or 'show software' command in the StarOS CLI to retrieve the installed software versionAffected if The version displayed is 16.5.2, 17.7.0, 18.4.0, 19.0.1, 19.3.0, 20.0.0 or any earlier version in the 16.x, 17.x, 18.x, 19.x, or 20.x branches prior to the fixed releases (19.3.M0.62771 or 20.0.M0.62768)
-
Confirm SSH service is enabledRun 'show configuration | include ssh' or 'show ssh server' to check if SSH server is active on the deviceAffected if SSH is enabled and the device is running an affected StarOS version listed above
-
Verify multi-user public-key authentication is configuredRun 'show configuration | include auth' or check the AAA configuration for public-key authentication methods. Look for 'public-key' in the authentication login configurationAffected if Public-key authentication is configured for SSH users on the device
-
Review active and recent SSH session recordsRun 'show ssh sessions' or 'show login history' to see current SSH connections and their source IP addresses, particularly noting any IP addresses shared between administrator and non-administrator accountsAffected if Multiple users (including administrators) have connected from the same source IP address, indicating potential for the IP reuse privilege escalation
-
Check privilege assignment for authenticated usersRun 'show configuration | include privilege' or review user privilege levels in the AAA configuration to confirm users are assigned different privilege levels (e.g., administrator vs. operator)Affected if Multiple privilege levels exist and SSH public-key authentication is in use, with the device running an affected version
The device is affected if it is a Cisco ASR 5000 running a vulnerable StarOS version (16.x through 20.x prior to the fixed releases) with SSH multi-user public-key authentication enabled, and there are shared IP addresses between administrator and regular user SSH sessions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco StarOS on ASR 5000 devices to version 19.3.M0.62771 or later (19.x) or 20.0.M0.62768 or later (20.x). If immediate patching is not possible, consider network segmentation to limit exposure and implement additional SSH connection monitoring.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-1335 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-1335 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data