CVE-2016-6467
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in IPv6 packet fragment reassembly of StarOS for Cisco Aggregation Services Router (ASR) 5000 Series Switch could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an unexpected reload of the Network Processing Unit (NPU) process. More Information: CSCva84552. Known Affected Releases: 20.0.0 21.0.0 21.0.M0.64702. Known Fixed Releases: 21.0.0 21.0.0.65256 21.0.M0.64970 21.0.V0.65150 21.1.A0.64973 21.1.PP0.65270 21.1.R0.65130 21.1.R0.65135 21.1.VC0.65203.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in IPv6 packet fragment reassembly in StarOS on Cisco ASR 5000 Series Switches allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to send specially crafted IPv6 packet fragments that cause an unexpected reload of the Network Processing Unit (NPU) process, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 20.0.0= 21.0.0= 21.0.m0.64702CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelVerify the hardware is a Cisco ASR 5000 Series Switch by checking the device inventory or running 'show hardware' commandAffected if Device is not an ASR 5000 Series Switch (different models are not affected)
-
Check StarOS versionRun 'show version' or 'show software' command to display the installed StarOS versionAffected if Version is 20.0.0, 21.0.0, or 21.0.m0.64702 specifically (these are the exact versions listed as affected)
-
Verify IPv6 is enabledCheck if IPv6 feature or service is enabled on the system using 'show ip interface' or 'show configuration | include ipv6'Affected if IPv6 is disabled - the vulnerability only affects IPv6 packet fragment reassembly processing
-
Confirm IPv6 traffic processingCheck if the device is configured to process IPv6 traffic by reviewing active interfaces with 'show ip interface' or checking IPv6 routing statusAffected if Device has no IPv6 interfaces configured or IPv6 routing is disabled - no attack surface exists
-
Compare version to affected rangesIf running a different version number than the three listed, compare it to the affected versions: 20.0.0, 21.0.0, 21.0.m0.64702Affected if Version matches exactly one of the three affected versions listed
Device is affected only if it is a Cisco ASR 5000 Series running StarOS version 20.0.0, 21.0.0, or 21.0.m0.64702 with IPv6 enabled and configured to process IPv6 traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate fixed StarOS release (21.0.0.65256, 21.0.M0.64970, 21.0.V0.65150, 21.1.A0.64973, 21.1.PP0.65270, 21.1.R0.65135, or 21.1.VC0.65203) or later. Until patched, consider filtering IPv6 traffic at network boundaries to block potentially malicious fragment packets.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6467 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6467 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data