CVE-2016-2302
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEcava IntegraXor before 5.0 build 4522 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading detailed error messages.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceEcava IntegraXor SCADA software versions before 5.0 build 4522 contains an information disclosure vulnerability where detailed error messages are exposed to remote attackers. This allows attackers to gather sensitive system information, configuration details, or internal paths through verbose error reporting.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.2.4502CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Ecava IntegraXor installationCheck for the IntegraXor service or executable on the system. Common paths include C:\Program Files\Ecava\IntegraXor\ or look for the service named 'IntegraXor' in Windows Services.Affected if The software is installed and running as a service on the system.
-
Determine installed version numberOpen the IntegraXor application or check the executable properties (right-click on IntegraXor.exe, view Details tab for version info). Alternatively, access the web interface and look for version information in the About or System Info section.Affected if The version is 4.2.4502 or lower, or the build number is 4502 or lower.
-
Verify error handling configurationLocate the IntegraXor configuration files (typically in the config folder within the installation directory) and check for error handling settings. Look for options like ShowErrors, DebugMode, or similar settings that control error message verbosity.Affected if Detailed error messages are enabled or Debug mode is turned on.
-
Test for verbose error outputTrigger a deliberate error condition (such as requesting a non-existent page or providing invalid input through the web interface) and observe the response. Compare the error output against what a normal user should see.Affected if The returned error page contains system paths, configuration details, stack traces, or internal server information.
A system is affected if Ecava IntegraXor version 4.2.4502 or lower is installed AND detailed error messages are displayed to users through the web interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to IntegraXor version 5.0 build 4522 or later, or implement custom error handling to suppress detailed error messages and display generic messages to users.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-2302 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-2302 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data