CVE-2016-6162
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditednet/core/skbuff.c in the Linux kernel 4.7-rc6 allows local users to cause a denial of service (panic) or possibly have unspecified other impact via certain IPv6 socket operations.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory corruption or NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in net/core/skbuff.c in Linux kernel 4.7-rc6. Local users can trigger a kernel panic (denial of service) or potentially achieve code execution through crafted IPv6 socket operations that improperly handle socket buffers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the running kernel versionRun 'uname -r' or 'cat /proc/version' to get the exact kernel versionAffected if The version is 4.7.x or 4.7-rc6 specifically
-
Verify IPv6 is enabled on the systemCheck /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/all/disable_ipv6 or run 'ip -6 addr show'; a value of 0 means IPv6 is activeAffected if IPv6 is enabled (value 0) and kernel is version 4.7
-
Determine if the system has local untrusted usersReview /etc/passwd for non-system user accounts or check /etc/sudoers for sudo access; check for world-writable directories that allow local user creationAffected if The system permits local user accounts beyond root and system service accounts
-
Inspect skbuff.c for patch statusCheck if the file //net/core/skbuff.c in the kernel source tree contains the fix: look for the 'frag' initialization or check the kernel config for CONFIG_IPV6=yAffected if The kernel source is unpatched and IPv6 support is compiled in (CONFIG_IPV6=y)
A system is affected if it runs Linux kernel 4.7.x with IPv6 enabled and permits local user access, since the vulnerability is triggered through crafted IPv6 socket operations by local users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied kernel patch or upgrade to a fixed kernel version that includes the corrected skbuff handling code for IPv6 operations; then reboot the system to load the patched kernel.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6162 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6162 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data