CVE-2016-6386
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCisco IOS XE 3.1 through 3.17 and 16.1 on 64-bit platforms allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (data-structure corruption and device reload) via fragmented IPv4 packets, aka Bug ID CSCux66005.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE software versions 3.1-3.17 and 16.1 on 64-bit platforms allows remote attackers to send specifically crafted fragmented IPv4 packets that cause data-structure corruption, leading to device reload and denial of service. The vulnerability is exploitable remotely without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1.0s= 3.1.0sg= 3.1.1s= 3.1.1sg= 3.1.2s= 3.1.3as= 3.1.4as= 3.1.4s= 3.2.0se= 3.2.1s= 3.2.1se= 3.2.2s= 16.1.2= 3.2.0ja= 3.3.0sg= 3.3.1sg= 3.3.2sg= 3.3.0xo= 3.3.1xo= 3.3.2xo= 3.4.0sg= 3.4.1sg= 3.4.2sg= 3.4.3sg= 3.4.4sg= 3.4.5sg= 3.4.6sg= 3.4.7sgCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS XE versionExecute 'show version' or 'show version | include Version' on the device CLI to retrieve the installed IOS XE version numberAffected if The displayed version matches any of the following: 3.1.0s, 3.1.0sg, 3.1.1s, 3.1.1sg, 3.1.2s, 3.1.3as, 3.1.4as, 3.1.4s, 3.2.0se, 3.2.1s, 3.2.1se, 3.2.2s, 16.1.2, 3.2.0ja, 3.3.0sg, 3.3.1sg, 3.3.2sg, 3.3.0xo, 3.3.1xo, 3.3.2xo, 3.4.0sg, 3.4.1sg, 3.4.2sg, 3.4.3sg, 3.4.4sg, 3.4.5sg, 3.4.6sg, or 3.4.7sg (
-
Confirm the hardware platform is 64-bitExecute 'show version' and look for the platform type in the output; 64-bit platforms typically include ASR 1000 series, ISR 4000 series, or similar high-end routersAffected if The device is a 64-bit Cisco platform running the affected IOS XE versions listed above
-
Verify IPv4 fragmentation processing is enabledCheck the device configuration with 'show running-config | include ip frag' or 'show ip interface' to see if IPv4 fragmentation handling is active on any interfaceAffected if IPv4 fragmentation processing is enabled on any interface (this is the default behavior; the vulnerability triggers when the device processes fragmented IPv4 packets)
-
Check for recent unexpected device reloadsReview logs with 'show log' or 'show reload' and look for unexplained system crashes or reload events that occurred without admin interventionAffected if The device has experienced unexplained reloads or crashes, which could indicate exploitation attempts
The environment is affected if the device runs Cisco IOS XE version 3.1 through 3.17 or 16.1 on a 64-bit platform and IPv4 fragmentation is enabled, which is the default configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate Cisco IOS XE software update or implement network-level filtering of fragmented IPv4 packets at perimeter devices to block malicious fragmented traffic.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6386 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6386 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data