CVE-2016-6441
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Transaction Language 1 (TL1) code of Cisco ASR 900 Series routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a reload of, or remotely execute code on, the affected system. This vulnerability affects Cisco ASR 900 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR902, ASR903, and ASR907) that are running the following releases of Cisco IOS XE Software: 3.17.0S 3.17.1S 3.17.2S 3.18.0S 3.18.1S. More Information: CSCuy15175. Known Affected Releases: 15.6(1)S 15.6(2)S. Known Fixed Releases: 15.6(1)S2.12 15.6(1.17)S0.41 15.6(1.17)SP 15.6(2)SP 16.4(0.183) 16.5(0.10).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow or similar memory corruption vulnerability in the Transaction Language 1 (TL1) interface of Cisco ASR 900 Series routers (ASR902, ASR903, ASR907) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause device reload. The flaw exists in IOS XE releases 3.17.x-3.18.x and 15.6(1)S/15.6(2)S.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.17.0s= 3.17.1s= 3.17.2s= 3.17s= 3.18.0s= 3.18.1s= 3.18sCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelRun 'show version' or 'show inventory' to confirm the hardware is a Cisco ASR 900 Series router (ASR902, ASR903, or ASR907)Affected if The device is not one of these three models, then it is not affected by this specific CVE
-
Check the installed IOS XE versionRun 'show version' and locate the IOS XE software version string (typically in the format 3.17.xs or 15.6(x)S)Affected if The version matches 3.17.0s, 3.17.1s, 3.17.2s, 3.17s, 3.18.0s, 3.18.1s, 3.18s, or falls within the 3.17.x-3.18.x or 15.6(1)S/15.6(2)S ranges
-
Verify if TL1 interface is configuredRun 'show running-config | include tl1' or 'show tl1 status' to check if the Transaction Language 1 interface is enabled on the deviceAffected if TL1 is actively enabled and listening, the device is vulnerable to exploitation
-
Check TL1 management access controlsExamine the configuration for TL1 management interface bindings using 'show running-config | section tl1' and verify access lists or management vlan restrictionsAffected if TL1 is exposed to untrusted networks or has no access restrictions, the device is vulnerable to remote unauthenticated attack
The device is affected if it is an ASR902/ASR903/ASR907 running IOS XE versions 3.17.x-3.18.x or 15.6(1)S/15.6(2)S with the TL1 interface enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cisco IOS XE to a fixed release (15.6(1)S2.12, 15.6(1.17)S0.41, 15.6(2)SP, 16.4+, or 16.5+). If immediate patching is not possible, disable or restrict TL1 management access to trusted management networks.
Upgrade to one of the fixed releases: 15.6(1)S2.12, 15.6(1.17)S0.41, 15.6(1.17)SP, 15.6(2)SP, 16.4(0.183), or 16.5(0.10) depending on the current software train
- 1. Identify the current Cisco IOS XE version running on the affected ASR902, ASR903, or ASR907 router using 'show version' command
- 2. If running 3.17.0S, 3.17.1S, 3.17.2S, 3.18.0S, or 3.18.1S, determine the appropriate fixed release based on the train (15.6.x or 16.x)
- 3. Download the fixed Cisco IOS XE software from Cisco.com (requires valid service contract)
- 4. Transfer the new IOS XE image to the router using FTP, SCP, or USB storage
- 5. Verify the image integrity using 'verify /md5 <file>' command
- 6. Configure the new boot variable: 'boot system flash:<new-image-name>'
- 7. Save configuration: 'write memory'
- 8. Reload the router: 'reload'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,608.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6441 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6441 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data