Telepresence Tc SoftwareApplication · Cisco

CVE-2016-6459

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-11-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cisco TelePresence endpoints running either CE or TC software contain a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute a local shell command injection. More Information: CSCvb25010. Known Affected Releases: 8.1.x. Known Fixed Releases: 6.3.4 7.3.7 8.2.2 8.3.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cisco TelePresence endpoints running CE or TC software versions 8.1.x contain a local shell command injection vulnerability. An authenticated, local attacker with access to the device can inject and execute arbitrary shell commands due to insufficient input validation in the authentication subsystem.

MitigationUpgrade Cisco TelePresence endpoints from affected versions (8.1.x) to fixed releases (6.3.4, 7.3.7, 8.2.2, or 8.3.0) as appropriate for the deployment. Coordinate maintenance window to avoid disruption.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Telepresence Tc SoftwareApplication
Affected:= 7.1.0= 7.1.1= 7.1.2= 7.1.3= 7.1.4= 7.3.0= 7.3.1= 7.3.2= 7.3.3= 8.0.0= 8.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device type
    Access the Cisco TelePresence endpoint via its web interface, CLI (SSH or console), or administrative console. Confirm the device is a Cisco TelePresence endpoint and note whether it runs CE software or TC software.
    Affected if The device is not a Cisco TelePresence endpoint running CE or TC software.
  2. Determine the exact software version
    In the CLI, run the command 'show version' or 'xversion'. In the web interface, navigate to Home > System Information or similar. Record the full version number (e.g., 8.1.0, 7.3.3).
    Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is not visible.
  3. Compare version against the affected list
    Check if the installed version matches exactly one of these: 7.1.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 7.1.3, 7.1.4, 7.3.0, 7.3.1, 7.3.2, 7.3.3, 8.0.0, or 8.1.0
    Affected if The installed version exactly matches any version in the list.
  4. Verify local authentication is enabled
    Check the authentication configuration in the web interface under Administration > Security > Authentication, or via CLI command 'show running-config | include auth' to confirm local user authentication is configured.
    Affected if Local authentication is enabled and users can access the device locally.

You are affected if you have a Cisco TelePresence endpoint running TC or CE software with a version that exactly matches 7.1.0-7.1.4, 7.3.0-7.3.3, 8.0.0, or 8.1.0 and local authentication is configured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Cisco TelePresence endpoints from affected versions (8.1.x) to fixed releases (6.3.4, 7.3.7, 8.2.2, or 8.3.0) as appropriate for the deployment. Coordinate maintenance window to avoid disruption.

Fix this in Telepresence Tc Software Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6459 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6459 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data