Emergency ResponderApplication · Cisco

CVE-2016-6468

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2016-12-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Emergency Responder could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. More Information: CSCvb06663. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1.10000.4). Known Fixed Releases: 12.0(0.98000.14).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cisco Emergency Responder's web-based management interface allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trick authenticated administrators into unknowingly executing arbitrary actions on the device. The lack of anti-CSRF tokens in the web interface enables attackers to craft malicious requests that the victim's browser automatically submits when authenticated.

MitigationUpgrade Cisco Emergency Responder to version 12.0(0.98000.14) or later to remediate the CSRF vulnerability. As an interim control, restrict web management interface access to trusted networks and educate administrators about not clicking untrusted links.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Emergency ResponderApplication
Affected:= 11.5\(1.10000.4\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Cisco Emergency Responder installation
    Log into the device CLI or check the system to confirm the product is Cisco Emergency Responder. Use 'show version' command or check the web interface login page for product identification.
    Affected if The product is not Cisco Emergency Responder, this CVE does not apply.
  2. Check installed version number
    Execute 'show version' on the device CLI or access the web-based management interface and locate the version information, typically found in the About or System Information page.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 11.5(1.10000.4) - this specific version is affected.
  3. Confirm web-based management interface is enabled
    Verify that the web-based management interface is accessible by attempting to reach the HTTP/HTTPS management URL, or check the device configuration for web interface status using 'show running-config | include http' or similar commands.
    Affected if The web management interface must be enabled for the CSRF vulnerability to be exploitable.
  4. Verify administrative access to the interface
    Check for existing administrator accounts configured for the web interface and determine if remote web access is permitted.
    Affected if Authenticated administrators must access the web interface for the CSRF attack to be executed against them.

A system is affected only if it is running exactly Cisco Emergency Responder version 11.5(1.10000.4) with the web-based management interface enabled and accessible to authenticated administrators.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Cisco Emergency Responder to version 12.0(0.98000.14) or later to remediate the CSRF vulnerability. As an interim control, restrict web management interface access to trusted networks and educate administrators about not clicking untrusted links.

Fix this in Emergency Responder Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-6468 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-6468 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data