CVE-2016-7472
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedF5 BIG-IP ASM version 12.1.0 - 12.1.1 may allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) via a crafted HTTP request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP ASM versions 12.1.0 through 12.1.1. Remote attackers can send specially crafted HTTP requests to trigger the DoS condition, potentially disrupting application security protection services.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1.0= 12.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify BIG-IP ASM is installedRun 'tmsh list sys software' or check the BIG-IP GUI under System > Software Management to see if ASM module is presentAffected if ASM module is not listed in the installed software
-
Check ASM version numberRun 'tmsh show sys version' or access the GUI under iControl > System > Version Info. Locate the Application Security Manager version entryAffected if The ASM version shown is exactly 12.1.0 or 12.1.1
-
Confirm ASM policy is active on virtual serversRun 'tmsh list ltm virtual' and check if any virtual server references an ASM policy (policy parameter points to an ASM policy name), or view virtual server settings in the GUI under Local Traffic > Virtual ServersAffected if At least one virtual server has an ASM security policy assigned and enabled
-
Validate ASM module is provisionedRun 'tmsh show sys provision' or check System > Resource Provisioning in the GUI to confirm ASM is provisionedAffected if ASM shows as provisioned (not 'none' or unavailable)
You are affected if ASM version 12.1.0 or 12.1.1 is installed AND ASM is provisioned and actively protecting at least one virtual server with an ASM policy.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade BIG-IP ASM to version 12.1.2 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, consider implementing additional upstream filtering or rate limiting to mitigate HTTP-based DoS attempts.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,144.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-7472 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-7472 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data