CVE-2026-40060
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the bd process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP where undisclosed HTTP requests targeting a virtual server protected by BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy cause the bd (bigd) process to terminate. The bd process handles WAF/ASM functionality, and its termination disrupts security policy enforcement.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or 'bigstart status' to determine the installed BIG-IP version. Compare against affected ranges: 16.1.0-16.1.6, 17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, 21.0.0Affected if Version matches any of the affected ranges (16.1.0-16.1.6, 17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, or 21.0.0)
-
Verify ASM or Advanced WAF module is provisionedRun 'tmsh list sys provision module' to list provisioned modules. Check if 'asm' or 'afm' (Advanced WAF) appears with a provision level other than 'none'Affected if ASM or Advanced WAF module is provisioned on the BIG-IP device
-
Identify virtual servers with WAF security policiesRun 'tmsh list ltm virtual' and look for the 'security-nat-policy' or 'policy' fields referencing ASM/Advanced WAF policies. Alternatively, check via Configuration Utility under Local Traffic > Virtual ServersAffected if Any virtual server has an ASM or Advanced WAF security policy applied
-
Check bd process status and logsRun 'bigstart status bd' to check if the bigd/bd process is running. Review /var/log/ltm for 'bd' or 'bigd' process termination events using 'grep -i bd /var/log/ltm'Affected if The bd process has terminated or is not running, especially after receiving unusual HTTP traffic
-
Confirm security policy is in blocking modeRun 'tmsh list asm policy' and check the 'enforcement-mode' setting. Also check the virtual server security policy configurationAffected if A security policy is actively enforced (not in transparent or learning mode) on a protected virtual server
You are affected if you run an affected BIG-IP version (16.1.x, 17.1.x, 17.5.x, or 21.0.0) with ASM or Advanced WAF module provisioned and a security policy applied to a virtual server receiving HTTP traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade to a fixed BIG-IP version when available. Until then, consider implementing rate limiting or request filtering at upstream devices to reduce exposure to the unknown attack vector.
BIG-IP 16.1.7+ (16.1.x), 17.1.4+ (17.1.x), 17.5.2+ (17.5.x), or 21.0.1+ (21.0.x) - whichever corresponds to your current major version branch
- 1. Identify the currently deployed BIG-IP ASM or Advanced WAF version using 'tmsh show sys version' or the web management console.
- 2. For BIG-IP 16.1.x deployments (16.1.0-16.1.6): Upgrade to BIG-IP 16.1.7 or later stable 16.1.x release.
- 3. For BIG-IP 17.1.x deployments (17.1.0-17.1.3): Upgrade to BIG-IP 17.1.4 or later stable 17.1.x release.
- 4. For BIG-IP 17.5.x deployments (17.5.0-17.5.1): Upgrade to BIG-IP 17.5.2 or later stable 17.5.x release.
- 5. For BIG-IP 21.0.0 deployments: Upgrade to BIG-IP 21.0.1 or later stable 21.0.x release.
- 6. After upgrade, verify the bd (bigd) process stability and confirm the security policy functions correctly.
- 7. Test the ASM/Advanced WAF policy in a staging environment before deploying to production.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-40060 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-40060 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data