CVE-2025-24326
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen BIG-IP Advanced WAF/ASM Behavioral DoS (BADoS) TLS Signatures feature is configured, undisclosed traffic can case an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP Advanced WAF/ASM's Behavioral DoS (BADoS) TLS Signatures feature. When this feature is configured, specific undisclosed traffic patterns trigger excessive memory allocation, potentially leading to memory exhaustion and service degradation or failure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.6.0.11.6-ENG>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.5>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify BIG-IP ASM versionCheck the installed version of F5 BIG-IP Application Security Manager (ASM) using the web UI (System > Software Management > Image List) or tmsh command 'show sys version'. Compare this version against the affected ranges: 15.1.0 to 15.1.10.6.0.11.6-ENG, 16.1.0 to 16.1.5, and 17.1.0 to 17.1.2.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the listed vulnerable version ranges.
-
Confirm ASM module provisioningVerify that the Application Security Manager module is provisioned on the BIG-IP system. Use the web UI (System > Resource Provisioning) or run 'tmsh show sys provision' to check the provisioning status of ASM.Affected if ASM is provisioned and running.
-
Check BADoS TLS Signatures configurationNavigate to the Behavioral DoS (BADoS) configuration in the BIG-IP ASM web UI (Security > DoS Protection > Device Configuration > Behavioral DoS). Inspect whether the TLS Signatures feature is enabled within the BADoS profile.Affected if The TLS Signatures feature in BADoS is enabled and configured.
-
Monitor memory utilizationObserve system memory usage over time using the web UI (Statistics > Performance > Throughput) or via tmsh command 'show sys memory'. Look for abnormal or steadily increasing memory consumption that correlates with the BADoS feature processing traffic.Affected if Memory usage is unusually high or continuously growing while the BADoS TLS Signatures feature is active.
You are affected if you are running a vulnerable ASM version (15.1.x, 16.1.x, or 17.1.x within the specified ranges) with the BADoS TLS Signatures feature enabled and are experiencing elevated memory usage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.10.6.0.11.6-ENG16.1.517.1.2
Apply the vendor patch when available. In the interim, consider disabling or restricting the BADoS TLS Signatures feature if operationally feasible, and monitor memory utilization closely.
15.1.10.6.0.11.6-ENG (or later 15.1.x) / 16.1.5 (or later 16.1.x) / 17.1.2 (or later 17.1.x)
- 1. Identify the currently deployed BIG-IP ASM version using 'tmsh show sys version' or the web management console.
- 2. Based on the current version branch, plan upgrade to the fixed release: For 15.1.x branch, upgrade to 15.1.10.6.0.11.6-ENG or later; For 16.1.x branch, upgrade to 16.1.5 or later; For 17.1.x branch, upgrade to 17.1.2 or later.
- 3. Before upgrading, review F5 release notes for the target version to confirm the CVE fix is included.
- 4. Perform a backup of the BIG-IP configuration using 'tmsh save sys config' or the web UI.
- 5. Download the target version ISO from F5 Networks (my.f5.com) and upload to the BIG-IP.
- 6. Follow F5 upgrade procedures: boot from ISO or use Volume Manager, then install the new version.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the BIG-IP ASM Behavioral DoS TLS Signatures feature functions correctly.
- 8. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by checking that memory utilization remains stable under the same traffic conditions.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-24326 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-24326 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data