CVE-2016-9644
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe __get_user_asm_ex macro in arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h in the Linux kernel 4.4.22 through 4.4.28 contains extended asm statements that are incompatible with the exception table, which allows local users to obtain root access on non-SMEP platforms via a crafted application. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of incorrect backporting of the CVE-2016-9178 patch to older kernels.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel 4.4.22-4.4.28 in the x86 __get_user_asm_ex macro used for safe user-space memory access. The macro contains extended asm statements that are incompatible with the kernel's exception table handling, allowing local attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on platforms lacking SMEP (Supervisor Mode Execution Prevention) protection. The bug resulted from incorrect backporting of an earlier CVE-2016-9178 fix.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.4.22= 4.4.23= 4.4.24= 4.4.25= 4.4.26= 4.4.27= 4.4.28CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed kernel versionRun `uname -r` or `cat /proc/version` to display the running kernel versionAffected if The version displayed is 4.4.22, 4.4.23, 4.4.24, 4.4.25, 4.4.26, 4.4.27, or 4.4.28
-
Confirm x86 architectureRun `uname -m` or check /proc/cpuinfo for 'GenuineIntel' or 'AuthenticAMD' and look for x86_64 or i686/i386 flagsAffected if The system is running on an x86 (i386, i686, or x86_64) architecture
-
Check if SMEP is enabledCheck /proc/cpuinfo for the 'smep' flag in the flags line, or verify if 'nosmep' is absent in /proc/cmdline boot parametersAffected if The 'smep' flag is NOT present in cpuinfo AND 'nosmep' is not in boot cmdline (indicating SMEP is disabled or unavailable)
The system is affected if it runs a Linux kernel between 4.4.22 and 4.4.28 on an x86 platform without SMEP protection enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade the kernel to version 4.4.29 or later, or apply the correct vendor patch for this vulnerability. Systems with SMEP enabled may have reduced exploitability but should still be patched.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-9644 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-9644 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data