CVE-2016-9877
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Pivotal RabbitMQ 3.x before 3.5.8 and 3.6.x before 3.6.6 and RabbitMQ for PCF 1.5.x before 1.5.20, 1.6.x before 1.6.12, and 1.7.x before 1.7.7. MQTT (MQ Telemetry Transport) connection authentication with a username/password pair succeeds if an existing username is provided but the password is omitted from the connection request. Connections that use TLS with a client-provided certificate are not affected.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMQTT plugin in RabbitMQ has an authentication bypass vulnerability where providing a valid username without any password successfully authenticates the connection. This allows unauthorized access to the messaging broker via the MQTT protocol.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.2= 3.0.3= 3.0.4= 3.1.0= 3.1.1= 3.1.2= 3.1.3= 3.1.4= 3.1.5= 3.2.0= 3.5.4= 3.5.5= 3.5.7= 3.6.0= 3.6.1= 3.6.2= 3.6.3= 3.6.4= 3.6.5= 1.5.0= 1.5.1= 1.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RabbitMQ versionRun `rabbitmqctl status` or check the management UI to find the installed RabbitMQ versionAffected if Version matches 3.0.0-3.2.0, 3.5.4-3.5.7, 3.6.0-3.6.5, or 1.5.0-1.5.2
-
Confirm MQTT plugin is enabledRun `rabbitmq-plugins list` and look for the MQTT plugin (rabbitmq_mqtt) in the enabled listAffected if MQTT plugin is enabled and version is in the affected range
-
Check if MQTT listener is configuredInspect RabbitMQ config file (rabbitmq.conf or advanced.config) or run `rabbitmqctl list_listeners` to see if port 1883 (MQTT) or 8883 (MQTT/SSL) is listeningAffected if MQTT port is open and listening, and version is affected
-
Verify MQTT authentication settingsCheck the MQTT plugin configuration in the config file for the `mqtt.default_user` or `mqtt.allow_empty_password` settingsAffected if MQTT plugin is configured and accepts connections without password validation
User is affected if RabbitMQ version is in the affected list, the MQTT plugin is enabled, and the MQTT listener is exposed - in this case, any connection with a valid username but no password can authenticate successfully.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade RabbitMQ to version 3.5.8+, 3.6.6+, or the corresponding PCF versions (1.5.20+, 1.6.12+, 1.7.7+). Until patched, ensure MQTT is not exposed to untrusted networks.
Upgrade to RabbitMQ 3.5.8+ or 3.6.6+ (3.6.x recommended for latest features and support)
- 1. Identify the current RabbitMQ version by running 'rabbitmqctl status' or checking the management UI
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version and infrastructure requirements
- 3. Back up RabbitMQ configuration files (rabbitmq.conf, advanced.config) and persistent data directories
- 4. For RabbitMQ 3.0.x: Upgrade directly to 3.5.8 or later, or to 3.6.6+ for longer-term support
- 5. For RabbitMQ 3.5.x (3.5.4-3.5.7): Upgrade to 3.5.8 or later
- 6. For RabbitMQ 3.6.0: Upgrade to 3.6.6 or later
- 7. After upgrade, verify the fix by testing MQTT authentication: confirm that connections with valid username but omitted password are now rejected
- 8. Ensure any automated scripts or applications using MQTT connections now include the password
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-9877 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-9877 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data