CVE-2026-57216
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6, AMQP 0-9-1, AMQP 1.0, and Stream Protocol authentication can allow a loopback-restricted user such as guest to connect remotely when traffic is accepted through a trusted PROXY-protocol path and the backend listener is loopback-bound because the loopback check uses the listener-side socket address instead of the real client source. This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, and 4.2.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRabbitMQ has an authentication bypass where the loopback check for restricted users (like 'guest') uses the listener-side socket address instead of the real client source IP when PROXY-protocol is in use. This allows remote attackers to bypass loopback-only restrictions and connect as guest from remote locations through a trusted PROXY-protocol path.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.13.0, < 4.2.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check RabbitMQ versionRun `rabbitmqctl status` or check the version via `rabbitmq-server --version`. Compare the version number to the affected range: >= 3.13.0 and < 4.2.6Affected if The installed version falls within >= 3.13.0, < 4.2.6
-
Verify PROXY-protocol is enabledInspect the RabbitMQ configuration file (rabbitmq.conf or advanced.config) or run `rabbitmqctl list_listeners` to check for the `proxy_protocol` setting on any listenerAffected if PROXY-protocol is enabled on any listener (proxy_protocol = true)
-
Check listener binding addressRun `rabbitmqctl list_listeners` to see which IP addresses each listener is bound to, or inspect the `listeners.tcp` configuration in rabbitmq.confAffected if A listener is bound to a non-loopback address (0.0.0.0 or external IP) while PROXY-protocol is enabled
-
Verify guest user loopback restrictionRun `rabbitmqctl list_users` to confirm the 'guest' user exists, then check if loopback_users only setting is in effect (default restricts guest to localhost connections)Affected if The 'guest' user is configured with loopback-only restriction (loopback_users only setting is non-empty, which is the default)
A user is affected if their RabbitMQ version is >= 3.13.0 and < 4.2.6, PROXY-protocol is enabled on a listener bound to a non-loopback address, and the guest user retains its default loopback-only restriction.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.2.6
Upgrade to RabbitMQ versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, or 4.2.6. Until then, avoid using PROXY-protocol with loopback-bound listeners that have restricted users like guest.
Upgrade to 4.2.6 (or the latest in your current major version branch: 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, or 4.2.6)
- 1. Identify the currently running RabbitMQ version using `rabbitmqctl status` or the management UI
- 2. Determine your current major version branch (3.13.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x, or 4.2.x)
- 3. Stop the RabbitMQ service gracefully using `rabbitmqctl stop` or your system service manager
- 4. Backup your RabbitMQ configuration, data directory, and Erlang cookie files before upgrading
- 5. Install the appropriate fixed version for your branch: 3.13.15 for 3.13.x, 4.0.20 for 4.0.x, 4.1.11 for 4.1.x, or 4.2.6 for 4.2.x
- 6. Start the RabbitMQ service and verify it starts successfully
- 7. Verify the upgrade by checking the version with `rabbitmqctl version`
- 8. Test that authentication works correctly and loopback-restricted users (like guest) can only connect from localhost as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-57216 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-57216 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data