CVE-2016-9988
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Jazz Foundation Reporting Service (JRS) 5.0 and 6.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 120554.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Jazz Foundation Reporting Service (JRS) versions 5.0 and 6.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows authenticated users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code into the web interface. This can alter application functionality and potentially steal session credentials or sensitive data within a trusted user session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.0= 5.0.1= 5.0.2= 6.0= 6.0.1= 6.0.2= 6.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Jazz Reporting Service version informationAccess the IBM Jazz Reporting Service admin console or about page. Typically this is found by navigating to the Jazz admin interface and selecting 'About' or 'Version Information' from the settings or help menu. The version is also often displayed on the login page footer or in the server's installation readme files.Affected if The displayed version matches 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 6.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, or 6.0.3
-
Verify the Jazz Foundation version via Web UILog into the Jazz Reporting Service web interface as an administrator. Navigate to the Server Diagnostics or About section within the Administration workspace to view the exact version number of both JRS and the underlying Jazz Foundation components.Affected if The reported JRS version equals any of the following: 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 6.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, or 6.0.3
-
Check the installation directory for version filesOn the server hosting the Jazz Reporting Service, locate the installation root directory. Look for version.info, about.xml, or similar version metadata files typically found in the lib or conf subdirectories of the Jazz installation.Affected if The version file lists any of these exact versions: 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 6.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, or 6.0.3
Your environment is affected if the installed Jazz Reporting Service version is exactly 5.0, 5.0.1, 5.0.2, 6.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, or 6.0.3, as these versions contain the vulnerable code that allows stored XSS.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM's security patch for this vulnerability (contact IBM support for fix availability). Additionally, implement output encoding and input validation for all user-supplied data, and configure Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2016-9988 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2016-9988 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data