CVE-2017-0144
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0145, CVE-2017-0146, and CVE-2017-0148.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCVE-2017-0144 is a remote code execution vulnerability in the SMBv1 server implementation affecting multiple Windows versions from Vista/Server 2008 through Windows 10/Server 2016. Attackers exploit this by sending specially crafted packets to vulnerable SMBv1 servers, potentially gaining full system control.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 13.02= 13.03= 13.20= 13.21= va10= vb10>= 4.0, < 4.0e= 5.0a= 1.0= 1.1>= 4.0, < 4.0e= 5.0aall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine if SMBv1 protocol is enabledOn Windows, run 'Get-SmbServerConfiguration | Select-Object EnableSMB1Protocol' in PowerShell, or check registry key 'HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters' for SMB1 valueAffected if SMBv1 is enabled (EnableSMB1Protocol returns True, or registry SMB1 value equals 1)
-
Confirm Windows version is within affected rangeRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to identify the Windows version and build numberAffected if Version is Windows Vista SP2 through Windows 10 (pre-Creators Update) or Windows Server 2016 without the relevant security patches installed
-
For Siemens Acuson P300 devices, verify firmware versionAccess device system information or administrative interface and check firmware versionAffected if Firmware version equals 13.02, 13.03, 13.20, or 13.21
-
For Siemens Acuson P500 devices, verify firmware versionAccess device system information or administrative interface and check firmware versionAffected if Firmware version equals va10 or vb10
-
For Siemens Acuson Sc2000, X700, or Syngo Sc2000 devices, verify firmware versionAccess device system information or administrative interface and check firmware versionAffected if Firmware version is 4.0 through 4.0d (less than 4.0e) or equals 5.0a
Environment is affected if SMBv1 is enabled on a vulnerable Windows version, or if the Siemens device firmware matches any of the specific versions listed in the affected ranges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.0e
Disable SMBv1 protocol on affected systems via Windows Features, Group Policy, or PowerShell, and apply Microsoft security patches. For systems requiring SMB, ensure only SMBv2/v3 are enabled and block port 445 at network perimeter if SMB is not externally needed.
- Disable SMBv1 on affected devices by following vendor-specific instructions (typically requires modifying Windows registry or using Windows Features to disable SMB1)
- If SMBv1 cannot be disabled, implement network segmentation to isolate affected devices from untrusted networks
- Block TCP ports 139, 445, and 137-138 at the network perimeter
- Apply vendor-supplied patches from Siemens CERT for Acuson and Syngo ultrasound systems when available
- For Acuson P300, P500, Sc2000, X700 and Syngo Sc2000: contact Siemens Healthineers technical support for firmware updates addressing CVE-2017-0144
- For Tissue Preparation System and Versant Kpcr Molecular System: contact Siemens Diagnostics technical support for security updates
- Restrict access to affected systems to only authorized personnel and essential network paths
- Monitor vendor security advisories from cert-portal.siemens.com for additional guidance
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-0144 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- portal.msrc.microsoft.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- portal.msrc.microsoft.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- ics-cert.us-cert.gov
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-0144 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data