CVE-2017-0148
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0143, CVE-2017-0144, CVE-2017-0145, and CVE-2017-0146.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a remote code execution vulnerability in the SMBv1 server implementation affecting multiple Windows versions. Attackers exploit this by sending specially crafted packets to vulnerable SMBv1 servers, allowing arbitrary code execution. This was one of the vulnerabilities in the EternalBlue exploit chain famously used by WannaCry ransomware.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 13.02= 13.03= 13.20= 13.21= va10= vb10>= 4.0, < 4.0e= 5.0a= 1.0= 1.1>= 4.0, <= 4.0e= 5.0aall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify SMBv1 protocol status on WindowsRun 'Get-SmbServerConfiguration | Select-Object EnableSMB1Protocol' in PowerShell, or check registry key 'HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanServer\Parameters\SMB1' (value 0 means disabled, 1 means enabled)Affected if SMBv1 is enabled (value is 1 or cmdlet returns True)
-
Confirm Windows version falls within affected rangeRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to identify the Windows version. Check against: Vista, Server 2008, 7/Server 2008 R2, 8.1/Server 2012 R2, 10, or Server 2016Affected if Windows version is Vista through Windows 10 or Server 2008 through Server 2016 AND SMBv1 is enabled
-
Detect if SMBv1 client is installed on Windows 10/Server 2016+Run 'Get-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online -FeatureName SMB1Protocol' to check if the SMB1 client feature is presentAffected if Feature state shows as Enabled or Present
-
Identify Siemens Acuson P300 firmware versionAccess the device management interface or check system documentation for firmware version informationAffected if Firmware version is exactly 13.02, 13.03, 13.20, or 13.21
-
Identify Siemens medical device firmware for other affected modelsCheck device system information or firmware inventory for Acuson P500, Acuson Sc2000, Acuson X700, Syngo Sc2000, Tissue Preparation System, or Versant Kpcr Molecular SystemAffected if Acuson P500: va10 or vb10; Acuson Sc2000/X700 or Syngo Sc2000: 4.0 through 4.0e or 5.0a; Tissue Preparation or Versant Kpcr: any version
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Windows version (Vista through 10/Server 2016) with SMBv1 protocol enabled, or if it is one of the listed Siemens medical devices with the specified firmware versions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.0e
Apply the relevant Microsoft security patches (MS17-010) to all affected systems. As a defense-in-depth measure, disable SMBv1 protocol via Group Policy or registry if not required for business operations.
For Windows systems: Apply MS17-010 security update (released March 2017). For medical devices: Contact vendor for specific firmware updates
- Apply Microsoft security update MS17-010 to patch the SMBv1 vulnerability in affected Windows systems (Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2/R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold/R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold/1511/1607, Windows Server 2016)
- If patching is not immediately possible, disable SMBv1 on affected systems via: Run 'OptionalFeatures.exe', uncheck 'SMB 1.0/CIFS File Sharing Support', or via PowerShell: 'Set-SmbServerConfiguration -EnableSMB1Protocol $false'
- For Siemens medical devices (Acuson P300, P500, Sc2000, X700, Syngo Sc2000, Tissue Preparation System, Versant Kpcr Molecular System), contact Siemens Healthineers for device-specific firmware updates and follow their remediation guidance
- Implement network segmentation to isolate vulnerable medical devices from broader network until patches/updates are applied
- Verify SMBv1 is disabled using: 'Get-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online -FeatureName SMB1Protocol'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-0148 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- portal.msrc.microsoft.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- portal.msrc.microsoft.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- packetstormsecurity.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- ics-cert.us-cert.gov
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.exploit-db.com
- www.cisa.gov
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-0148 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data