Ubuntu ImageApplication · Canonical

CVE-2017-10600

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-07-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
64/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ubuntu-image 1.0 before 2017-07-07, when invoked as non-root, creates files in the resulting image with the uid of the invoking user. When the resulting image is booted, a local attacker with the same uid as the image creator has unintended access to cloud-init and snapd directories.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

ubuntu-image 1.0 before July 7, 2017 creates files in generated disk images with the UID of the non-root user who invokes the tool, instead of proper system users (root). This causes sensitive directories like cloud-init and snapd to be owned by the invoking user's UID, allowing any local attacker with matching UID to access these privileged directories when the image is booted.

MitigationRun ubuntu-image as root when building images, or upgrade to version 1.0+ released after 2017-07-07 which properly sets file ownership to root/system users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ubuntu ImageApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed ubuntu-image version
    Run 'dpkg -l ubuntu-image' or 'ubuntu-image --version' to determine the version number
    Affected if Version is 1.0 and was released before July 7, 2017 (check with 'apt-cache policy ubuntu-image' for date)
  2. Identify if ubuntu-image was run as non-root
    Review command history or logs for instances where 'ubuntu-image' was executed without sudo/root privileges
    Affected if ubuntu-image was invoked by a non-root user account (check with 'id' to see current user UID)
  3. Locate generated disk image files
    Search for .img, .qcow2, or disk image files created by ubuntu-image in home directories, build directories, or /var/tmp/
    Affected if Disk images exist that were built using the vulnerable ubuntu-image version
  4. Inspect file ownership in generated images
    Mount the generated disk image and run 'ls -la' on /var/lib/cloud, /var/lib/snapd, or /etc/cloud/ and /etc/snapd to check UID ownership of files and directories
    Affected if Files or directories within cloud-init or snapd paths are owned by a non-root UID (typically the UID of the user who ran ubuntu-image)
  5. Compare image UID to system users
    Check if the UID owning sensitive directories in the mounted image matches any local user account with 'id <UID>' or 'getent passwd <UID>'
    Affected if The UID owning cloud-init or snapd directories in the image matches a non-privileged local user account

A user is affected if they used ubuntu-image version 1.0 (pre-July 7, 2017) as a non-root user to generate disk images, resulting in sensitive directories in those images being owned by their non-root UID.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Run ubuntu-image as root when building images, or upgrade to version 1.0+ released after 2017-07-07 which properly sets file ownership to root/system users.

Fix this in Ubuntu Image Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
3.0 hours of engineering $750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-10600 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-10600 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data