CVE-2017-12819
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRemote manipulations with language pack updater lead to NTLM-relay attack for system user in Gemalto's HASP SRM, Sentinel HASP and Sentinel LDK products prior to Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the language pack updater component of Gemalto's HASP SRM, Sentinel HASP and Sentinel LDK licensing products allows remote attackers to perform NTLM-relay attacks, potentially compromising system-level privileges. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 9.8 (Critical), indicating severe risk of complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.50CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Sentinel LDK or HASP licensing software is installedCheck for installed software named 'Sentinel LDK', 'HASP SRM', 'Sentinel HASP' or 'Sentinel LDK RTE' in system programs or servicesAffected if The software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed version of Sentinel LDK RTELocate the installed Sentinel LDK software and check its version property or check version via installed programs list, registry entries, or the haspdinst.exe /info outputAffected if The version is 7.50 or earlier (any version <= 7.50)
-
Verify if the language pack updater component is runningCheck for running services or processes related to 'hasplmd', 'haspd', 'Sentinel LDK License Manager' or port 1947 which is commonly used by the language pack updaterAffected if The language pack updater service is active and listening on network ports
-
Assess network exposure of the licensing serviceReview firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the Sentinel licensing service ports (commonly 1947, 475, 1947/TCP) are exposed to untrusted networksAffected if The licensing service is accessible from untrusted or external networks
-
Check for NTLM authentication settingsReview NTLM authentication configuration on the host to understand if NTLM relay attacks would be possible on the affected serviceAffected if NTLM authentication is allowed without SMB signing enforcement
The environment is affected if Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.50 or earlier is installed with the language pack updater component running and network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the language pack updater and implement SMB signing to mitigate NTLM-relay attacks.
Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55
- Identify all systems running Sentinel LDK RTE with firmware version 7.50 or earlier
- Obtain Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55 or later from the official Gemalto/Sentinel vendor website
- Test the upgrade in a non-production/staging environment to verify compatibility
- Schedule a maintenance window following change management procedures
- Apply the firmware upgrade to production systems running the affected Sentinel LDK products
- Verify the installed version is 7.55 or later using the system's version check mechanism
- Confirm the language pack updater functionality is operating normally after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12819 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12819 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data