Sentinel Ldk Rte FirmwareOperating system · Sentinel

CVE-2017-12822

CRITICAL · 9.9 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-10-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 7.50 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Remote enabling and disabling admin interface in Gemalto's HASP SRM, Sentinel HASP and Sentinel LDK products prior to Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55 leads to new attack vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This vulnerability in Gemalto Sentinel HASP SRM, Sentinel HASP and Sentinel LDK products allows remote enabling and disabling of the admin interface prior to version 7.55, creating new attack vectors for potential remote code execution or system compromise.

MitigationUpdate to Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Sentinel Ldk Rte FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= 7.50

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate Sentinel LDK RTE installation
    Check for the Sentinel LDK RTE installation directory, typically found at C:\Program Files\Sentinel or C:\Program Files (x86)\Sentinel, or look for the haspdinst.exe or类似进程
    Affected if Sentinel LDK RTE software is present on the system
  2. Identify installed version
    Right-click the installed executable (such as haspdinst.exe or aksfridge.exe) and view Properties, or check the version information in the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Sentinel or HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Sentinel
    Affected if Installed version is 7.50 or earlier
  3. Compare against affected range
    Compare the identified version number against the affected range (version 7.50 and below)
    Affected if Version is 7.50 or lower, as versions above 7.55 contain the fix
  4. Check admin interface status
    Examine configuration files in the Sentinel installation directory for admin-related settings, or review network listening ports (commonly ports 1947 and 1948) that expose the admin interface
    Affected if The admin interface is enabled or accessible on the network, as this is the vulnerable component that can be remotely manipulated

A system is affected if Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.50 or earlier is installed and the admin interface is exposed, allowing remote enabling/disabling that creates additional attack vectors.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 7.50
Interim mitigation

Update to Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55 or later

  1. Identify all systems running Sentinel LDK RTE firmware version 7.50 or earlier
  2. Obtain Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55 or later from the official vendor (Gemalto/Thales)
  3. Backup current configuration and data on affected systems
  4. Deploy and install Sentinel LDK RTE version 7.55 on all affected systems
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the firmware version
  6. Confirm the admin interface authentication is now properly enforced

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Sentinel Ldk Rte Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-12822 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-12822 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data