CVE-2017-13077
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWi-Fi Protected Access (WPA and WPA2) allows reinstallation of the Pairwise Transient Key (PTK) Temporal Key (TK) during the four-way handshake, allowing an attacker within radio range to replay, decrypt, or spoof frames.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCVE-2017-13077 is a vulnerability in the WPA/WPA2 four-way handshake that allows reinstallation of the Pairwise Transient Key (PTK) Temporal Key (TK). An attacker within radio range can exploit this to replay, decrypt, or spoof Wi-Fi frames by forcing reinstallation of cryptographic keys during the handshake process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 14.04= 16.04= 17.04= 8.0= 9.0all versions= 10= 10.4= 11= 11.1= 7= 7= 42.2= 42.3= 0.2.4= 0.2.5= 0.2.6= 0.2.8= 0.3.7= 0.3.9= 0.3.10= 0.3.11= 0.4.7= 0.4.8= 0.4.9= 0.4.10= 0.2.4= 0.2.5= 0.2.6= 0.2.7= 0.2.8= 0.3.7= 0.3.8= 0.3.9= 0.3.10= 0.3.11= 0.4.7= 0.4.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed hostapd versionRun 'dpkg -l hostapd' (Debian/Ubuntu) or 'rpm -qi hostapd' (RHEL/openSUSE) or check /usr/sbin/hostapd --versionAffected if The version matches any of: 0.2.4, 0.2.5, 0.2.6, 0.2.8, 0.3.7, 0.3.9, 0.3.10, 0.3.11, 0.4.7, 0.4.8, 0.4.9, 0.4.10
-
Identify installed wpa_supplicant versionRun 'dpkg -l wpasupplicant' (Debian/Ubuntu) or 'rpm -qi wpa_supplicant' (RHEL/openSUSE) or check wpa_supplicant --versionAffected if The version matches any of: 0.2.4 through 0.2.8, 0.3.7 through 0.3.11, 0.4.7, 0.4.8
-
Verify if Wi-Fi interface is configuredRun 'ip link show' or 'iwconfig' to list wireless interfaces, then check 'iw dev <interface> info' for connection statusAffected if A Wi-Fi interface exists and is using WPA/WPA2 authentication (check /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf or NetworkManager settings)
-
Check FreeBSD base system versionRun 'freebsd-version' or 'uname -r' on FreeBSD systemsAffected if Version is 10.x, 10.4, 11.x, or 11.1 and the system runs hostapd or has wireless functionality enabled
-
Check Linux distribution version for affected Ubuntu/Debian/RHELRun 'lsb_release -a' (Ubuntu) or 'cat /etc/debian_version' (Debian) or 'cat /etc/redhat-release' (RHEL)Affected if Ubuntu 14.04, 16.04, or 17.04; Debian 8.0 or 9.0; RHEL 7 (Desktop or Server) is installed AND the system uses the affected Wi-Fi software versions
You are affected if your system runs a vulnerable version of hostapd or wpa_supplicant (matching the listed versions) and has an active Wi-Fi interface using WPA/WPA2 authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-specific patches to affected Wi-Fi access points and client devices. Until patched, use WPA3 where available or consider additional network-layer encryption (VPN) as a compensating control.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-13077 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.arubanetworks.com
- www.debian.org
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- security.FreeBSD.org
- support.lenovo.com
- tools.cisco.com
- w1.fi
- www.krackattacks.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.oracle.com
- www.securitytracker.com
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- cert.vde.com
- cert.vde.com
- lists.debian.org
- security.gentoo.org
- source.android.com
- source.android.com
- source.android.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.apple.com
- support.hpe.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-13077 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data