CVE-2017-14180
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApport 2.13 through 2.20.7 does not properly handle crashes originating from a PID namespace allowing local users to create certain files as root which an attacker could leverage to perform a denial of service via resource exhaustion or possibly gain root privileges, a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-14179.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceApport versions 2.13 through 2.20.7 fail to properly handle crashes originating from PID namespaces, allowing local users to create certain files as root. This improper handling could enable denial of service via resource exhaustion or potentially lead to privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 14.04= 16.04= 17.04= 17.10= 18.04>= 2.13, <= 2.20.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Apport is installedRun 'which apport' or check your package manager for the apport package (e.g., 'dpkg -l apport' on Debian/Ubuntu systems)Affected if Apport is not installed on the system - if it is installed, proceed to next check
-
Determine installed Apport versionRun 'apport-cli --version' or 'dpkg -l apport' to obtain the exact version number of the installed Apport packageAffected if The installed version falls within the range 2.13 through 2.20.7 (inclusive) - this indicates vulnerability to the PID namespace crash handling issue
-
Confirm crash reporting is enabledCheck Apport configuration files (typically in /etc/apport/ or ~/.config/apport/) for enabled settings, or run 'apport-cli --bug' to verify crash reporting functionality is activeAffected if Crash reporting is enabled and Apport is running - the vulnerability only applies when Apport can process crash reports from PID namespaces
-
Identify PID namespace usageReview running processes and containers to determine if PID namespaces are in use (check for 'unshare' processes, container runtimes like Docker/LXD, or namespace-enabled processes via 'ls -la /proc/*/ns/')Affected if The system or any user context is actively using PID namespaces - crashes originating from PID namespace processes trigger the flawed handling code
A system is affected if it has Apport version 2.13-2.20.7 installed, crash reporting is enabled, and the system uses or permits PID namespaces where crashes can occur, potentially allowing local users to create root-owned files or cause resource exhaustion.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Apport to a version beyond 2.20.7 where the PID namespace crash handling is properly implemented. As a temporary workaround, consider restricting or disabling Apport crash reporting for untrusted contexts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-14180 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-14180 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data