CVE-2017-14190
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 5.6.0 to 5.6.2, 5.4.0 to 5.4.7, 5.2 and earlier, allows attacker to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via maliciously crafted "Host" header in user HTTP requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-site Scripting vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS allows attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript via maliciously crafted Host headers in HTTP requests. The vulnerability affects versions 5.6.0-5.6.2, 5.4.0-5.4.7, and 5.2 and earlier.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.2.0>= 5.4.0, <= 5.4.7>= 5.6.0, <= 5.6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiOS versionLog into the FortiGate CLI and run the command 'get system status' or 'get system version' to retrieve the installed FortiOS version numberAffected if The displayed version falls within 5.2.x and earlier, 5.4.0-5.4.7, or 5.6.0-5.6.2
-
Verify firmware branchFrom the FortiOS CLI, run 'get system firmware' to see the full firmware version details including build numberAffected if The firmware version matches any of the affected ranges listed in the CVE
-
Cross-reference with official Fortinet advisoryVisit the Fortinet security advisory page for CVE-2017-14190 and confirm your exact version is listed as vulnerableAffected if Your FortiOS version appears on the affected versions list and has not been patched to 5.6.3, 5.4.8, or later
If the FortiOS version is 5.6.2 or lower in the 5.6 branch, 5.4.7 or lower in the 5.4 branch, or 5.2.x or earlier, the system is vulnerable to stored XSS via malicious Host headers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade FortiOS to version 5.6.3, 5.4.8, or later which contains the patch. Alternatively, implement HTTP header validation or WAF rules at upstream devices to sanitize or block malicious Host headers.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-14190 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-14190 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data