CVE-2017-15354
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHuawei DP300, V500R002C00, RP200, V600R006C00, TE30, V100R001C10, V500R002C00,V600R006C00, TE40, V500R002C00, V600R006C00, TE50, V500R002C00,V600R006C00, TE60, V100R001C10, V500R002C00, V600R006C00, TX50,V500R002C00, V600R006C00 have a buffer overflow vulnerability. An attacker may send specially crafted HTTP messages to the affected products. Due insufficient input validation of three different parameters in the messages, successful exploit may cause some service abnormal.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in Huawei DP300, RP200, TE30, TE40, TE50, TE60, and TX50 video conferencing products. The vulnerability exists due to insufficient input validation of three parameters in specially crafted HTTP messages, allowing remote attackers to cause service abnormalities.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v100r001c10= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v100r001c10= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v500r002c00= v600r006c00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the video conferencing device modelAccess the device management interface or system information page to determine the exact model number (DP300, RP200, TE30, TE40, TE50, TE60, or TX50)Affected if The device model is NOT one of these seven: DP300, RP200, TE30, TE40, TE50, TE60, TX50
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device system information or firmware version display through the management interface and note the exact version stringAffected if The firmware version matches exactly one of these: v500r002c00, v600r006c00, or v100r001c10 for the identified model (see the provided product/version mapping)
-
Determine if HTTP management interface is network-accessibleVerify whether the device HTTP service (typically port 80 or 443) is listening and reachable from network segments, including internal networksAffected if HTTP management interface is exposed to network (this is required for the specially crafted HTTP messages to reach the vulnerability)
-
Review device logs for exploitation indicatorsExamine system logs, security logs, and error logs for entries indicating service abnormalities, crashes, or unexpected behavior potentially linked to buffer overflow exploitationAffected if Logs show service restarts, crashes, or anomalous HTTP request errors
The device is affected if it is one of the seven listed product models AND runs one of the exact firmware versions specified AND has its HTTP management interface network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Huawei security patches for the affected firmware versions. If patches are unavailable, restrict network access to the HTTP management interfaces of affected devices and implement input validation on incoming HTTP traffic.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-15354 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-15354 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data