CVE-2017-16548
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe receive_xattr function in xattrs.c in rsync 3.1.2 and 3.1.3-development does not check for a trailing '\0' character in an xattr name, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer over-read and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by sending crafted data to the daemon.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA heap-based buffer over-read vulnerability exists in rsync's receive_xattr function (xattrs.c) in versions 3.1.2 and 3.1.3-development. The function fails to validate the presence of a trailing null terminator ('\0') in extended attribute names, allowing remote attackers sending crafted data to the rsync daemon to read beyond heap buffer boundaries. This can cause denial of service via application crash and potentially enable arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.04= 14.04= 16.04= 17.10= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0> 2.6.9, <= 3.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check rsync versionRun 'rsync --version' and note the version number in the output (e.g., rsync version 3.1.2)Affected if Version is 3.1.2 or 3.1.3-development (versions prior to 3.1.3-stable)
-
Identify if rsync daemon is runningCheck for running rsyncd process with 'ps aux | grep rsyncd' or look for /etc/rsyncd.conf configuration fileAffected if rsync daemon mode is actively running or configured to run
-
Verify daemon configuration for xattr supportInspect /etc/rsyncd.conf for any share definitions; check if the system uses extended attributes (xattrs) in any rsync transfer configurationsAffected if rsyncd is configured and daemon mode accepts incoming connections that could include xattr data
-
Confirm daemon exposureReview network listening status with 'netstat -tlnp | grep 873' or 'ss -tlnp | grep 873' to see if rsync daemon port 873 is listeningAffected if rsync daemon port 873 is open and accessible on network interfaces
Affected if rsync version is 3.1.2 or 3.1.3-development AND the rsync daemon is enabled and exposed, allowing remote attackers to send crafted xattr data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate rsync to version 3.1.3-stable or later, which includes the null terminator check. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict or disable daemon mode access and consider blocking external xattr-handling connections at the network perimeter.
rsync 3.1.3 or later
- Check current rsync version by running: rsync --version
- For Ubuntu/Debian systems, update package lists: sudo apt-get update
- Upgrade rsync to the fixed version: sudo apt-get install rsync
- Verify the upgraded version: rsync --version
- If running rsync as a daemon, restart the service: sudo systemctl restart rsync
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-16548 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-16548 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data