CVE-2017-17135
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPEM module of Huawei DP300 V500R002C00; IPS Module V500R001C00; V500R001C30; NGFW Module V500R001C00; V500R002C00; NIP6300 V500R001C00; V500R001C30; NIP6600 V500R001C00; V500R001C30; RP200 V500R002C00; V600R006C00; S12700 V200R007C00; V200R007C01; V200R008C00; V200R009C00; V200R010C00; S1700 V200R006C10; V200R009C00; V200R010C00; S2700 V200R006C10; V200R007C00; V200R008C00; V200R009C00; V200R010C00; S5700 V200R006C00; V200R007C00; V200R008C00; V200R009C00; V200R010C00; S6700 V200R008C00; V200R009C00; V200R010C00; S7700 V200R007C00; V200R008C00; V200R009C00; V200R010C00; S9700 V200R007C00; V200R007C01; V200R008C00; V200R009C00; V200R010C00; Secospace USG6300 V500R001C00; V500R001C30; Secospace USG6500 V500R001C00; V500R001C30; Secospace USG6600 V500R001C00; V500R001C30S; TE30 V100R001C02; V100R001C10; V500R002C00; V600R006C00; TE40 V500R002C00; V600R006C00; TE50 V500R002C00; V600R006C00; TE60 V100R001C01; V100R001C10; V500R002C00; V600R006C00; TP3106 V100R002C00; TP3206 V100R002C00; V100R002C10; USG9500 V500R001C00; V500R001C30; ViewPoint 9030 V100R011C02; V100R011C03 has a null pointer reference vulnerability due to insufficient verification. An authenticated local attacker calls PEM decoder with special parameter which could cause a denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA null pointer reference vulnerability exists in the PEM module of multiple Huawei products (firewalls, switches, routers, video conferencing systems). An authenticated local attacker with low privileges can exploit insufficient input validation in the PEM decoder by calling it with a specially crafted parameter, causing a null pointer dereference that leads to denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v500r002c00= v500r001c00= v500r001c30= v500r001c00= v500r002c00= v500r001c00= v500r001c30= v500r001c00= v500r001c30= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v200r007c00= v200r007c01= v200r008c00= v200r009c00= v200r010c00= v200r006c10= v200r009c00= v200r010c00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Huawei product modelLog into the device management interface or check the device label to determine the exact model (Dp300, Ips Module, Ngfw Module, Nip6300, Nip6600, Rp200, S12700, or S1700)Affected if The model is any of the eight affected products listed in the CVE
-
Check the firmware versionAccess the device CLI or web management interface and run 'display version' or navigate to the system info page to retrieve the installed firmware versionAffected if The firmware version matches exactly one of these: Dp300=v500r002c00; Ips Module=v500r001c00 or v500r001c30; Ngfw Module=v500r001c00 or v500r002c00; Nip6300=v500r001c00 or v500r001c30; Nip6600=v500r001c00 or v500r001c30; Rp200=v500r002c00 or v600r006c00; S12700=v200r007c00, v200r007c01, v200r008c00,
-
Verify PEM module accessibilityCheck if the PEM (Privacy Enhanced Mail) decoder module is accessible on the device by reviewing the device feature list or attempting to access PEM-related configuration optionsAffected if The PEM decoder feature is available and accessible on the device (the vulnerability exists in the PEM module itself)
-
Confirm local authentication statusDetermine if local user accounts with low privilege levels exist on the system by reviewing the user database or AAA configurationAffected if Local authenticated users exist on the device (exploitation requires an authenticated local attacker with low privileges)
A user is affected if they are running any of the listed product models with a firmware version that exactly matches one of the affected versions, and the PEM module is accessible to local authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches for the specific product versions listed. Restrict local administrative access to trusted authenticated users only and implement least privilege access controls.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-17135 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-17135 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data