CVE-2017-17150
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTimergrp module in Huawei DP300 V500R002C00; RP200 V500R002C00; V600R006C00; TE30 V100R001C10; V500R002C00; V600R006C00; TE40 V500R002C00; V600R006C00; TE50 V500R002C00; V600R006C00; TE60 V100R001C10; V500R002C00; V600R006C00 have an DoS vulnerability due to insufficient validation of the parameter. An authenticated local attacker may call a special API with special parameter, which cause an infinite loop. Successful exploit of this vulnerability can allow an attacker to launch DOS attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Timergrp module in multiple Huawei video conferencing devices (DP300, RP200, TE30/40/50/60) contains a DoS vulnerability caused by insufficient validation of API parameters. An authenticated local attacker can call a specific API with a specially crafted parameter that triggers an infinite loop, causing the device to become unresponsive.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v500r002c00= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v100r001c10= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v500r002c00= v600r006c00= v100r001c10= v500r002c00= v600r006c00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelDetermine the exact model number of the Huawei video conferencing device (DP300, RP200, TE30, TE40, TE50, or TE60)Affected if Device model is DP300, RP200, TE30, TE40, TE50, or TE60
-
Check firmware versionRetrieve the installed firmware version from the device system settings or via CLI command such as 'display version' or 'system-info'Affected if Firmware version matches v100r001c10, v500r002c00, or v600r006c00 for the affected model
-
Verify Timergrp module presenceCheck if the Timergrp module is loaded or available on the device, typically via 'display module' or similar system information commandAffected if Timergrp module is present and accessible on the device
-
Confirm API access capabilityVerify whether authenticated local access to the device API interface is available, typically through CLI or web management portalAffected if Authenticated local API access is enabled and reachable
-
Check for device responsivenessPing the device or attempt to access the management interface to verify normal operationAffected if Device is unresponsive or experiencing denial of service symptoms
A user is affected if the device is a Huawei DP300, RP200, TE30, TE40, TE50, or TE60 running firmware version v100r001c10, v500r002c00, or v600r006c00, the Timergrp module is present, and the device has become unresponsive due to an infinite loop triggered by a specially crafted API parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates for affected versions (V500R002C00, V600R006C00, V100R001C10). Until patches are available, restrict local authenticated access to trusted personnel only and monitor for devices becoming unresponsive.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-17150 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-17150 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data