CVE-2017-18113
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe DefaultOSWorkflowConfigurator class in Jira Server and Jira Data Center before version 8.18.1 allows remote attackers who can trick a system administrator to import their malicious workflow to execute arbitrary code via a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability. The vulnerability allowed for various problematic OSWorkflow classes to be used as part of workflows. The fix for this issue blocks usage of unsafe conditions, validators, functions and registers that are build-in into OSWorkflow library and other Jira dependencies. Atlassian-made functions or functions provided by 3rd party plugins are not affected by this fix.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Remote Code Execution vulnerability in Jira's DefaultOSWorkflowConfigurator class allows attackers to inject malicious OSWorkflow components (conditions, validators, functions, registers) by tricking a system administrator into importing a specially crafted workflow. The fix in Jira 8.18.1 blocks usage of unsafe built-in OSWorkflow library classes while preserving Atlassian-made and third-party plugin functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.18.1< 8.18.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Jira versionNavigate to Administration > System > Troubleshooting and support > System info, or call the /rest/api/2/serverInfo API endpoint, or check the <jira-install>/atlassian-jira/WEB-INF/classes/application-info.xml fileAffected if The displayed version is earlier than 8.18.1 (for example, 8.17.0, 8.10.0, 7.x, etc.)
-
Identify imported custom workflowsNavigate to Administration > Issues > Workflows > View workflows, or inspect XML workflow descriptor files in the <jira-home>/workflows/ directoryAffected if Any custom workflows are present that were imported from external sources rather than created through the Jira UI
-
Check for recent workflow importsReview Jira audit logs under Administration > System > Audit logs, filtering for events containing 'workflow' and 'import'Affected if Workflow import events exist from within the past 90 days, especially from untrusted sources
-
Verify workflow XML for unsafe OSWorkflow classesExport any custom workflows and inspect the XML descriptors for references to com.opensymphony.workflow.* or other native OSWorkflow classes in <condition>, <validator>, <function>, or <register> elementsAffected if The workflow XML contains references to raw OSWorkflow library classes rather than only Atlassian-built or plugin-provided components
A user is affected if their Jira version is below 8.18.1 AND they have imported or could import custom workflow definitions, as the vulnerability allows RCE via malicious workflow components.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.18.1
Upgrade Jira Server or Jira Data Center to version 8.18.1 or later. Until patched, exercise extreme caution with workflow imports and only accept workflows from trusted sources.
8.18.1
- Upgrade Jira Server or Jira Data Center to version 8.18.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Jira version in About Jira
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-18113 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-18113 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data