CVE-2021-39113
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAffected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow anonymous remote attackers to continue to view cached content even after losing permissions, via a Broken Access Control vulnerability in the allowlist feature. The affected versions are before version 8.13.9, and from version 8.14.0 before 8.18.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a Broken Access Control vulnerability in Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center's allowlist feature. Anonymous remote attackers can continue to view cached content even after losing permissions, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive information. The vulnerability affects versions before 8.13.9 and from 8.14.0 before 8.18.0.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.13.9< 8.13.9>= 8.14.0, < 8.18.0>= 8.14.0, < 8.18.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Jira version installedNavigate to Jira Administration > System > Troubleshooting and support tools, or access /rest/api/2/serverInfo to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is less than 8.13.9, or greater than or equal to 8.14.0 but less than 8.18.0
-
Verify if anonymous access is enabledGo to Jira Administration > Security > Global Permissions and check if 'Anonymous' permission is granted to any user group or if 'Allow anonymous access' is enabled in security settingsAffected if Anonymous access is enabled, as the vulnerability allows anonymous attackers to access cached content after losing permissions
-
Confirm allowlist feature usageCheck Jira Administration > Security > Allowlist (or browse /plugins/servlet/allowed-admin-scheme if accessible) to see if any URLs or domains are configured in the allowlistAffected if The allowlist feature contains entries, as the vulnerability exploits how cached content is handled when allowlist permissions are revoked
-
Inspect cache configuration for sensitive contentExamine the application cache directory (typically <jira-home>/cache or <jira-install>/caches) for stored content that may have been accessible to anonymous users before permission changesAffected if Cache directories contain content that may have been accessible under previous allowlist permissions
A Jira instance is affected if it runs a version between 8.14.0-8.17.x or below 8.13.9, has anonymous access enabled, and uses the allowlist feature where cached content may remain accessible after permissions are revoked.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.13.98.18.0
Upgrade Jira Server or Data Center to version 8.18.0 or later (or 8.13.9 or later for the 8.13.x branch) to remediate this vulnerability.
Upgrade to Jira 8.18.0 or later (latest stable release)
- Review the Atlassian upgrade guide for your current version
- Back up your Jira database and installation directory
- Download the target version (8.18.0 or later) from the official Atlassian website
- Stop your Jira application server
- Install the new version following Atlassian's upgrade documentation
- Start the Jira application and verify the upgrade was successful
- Test that the allowlist feature properly expires cached content after permissions are revoked
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39113 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39113 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data