CVE-2017-20011
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in WEKA INTEREST Security Scanner 1.8. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component HTTP Handler. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in the HTTP Handler component of WEKA INTEREST Security Scanner 1.8. The vulnerability is locally exploitable and allows an attacker to crash the application via manipulated input to the HTTP Handler. The exploit has been publicly disclosed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Weka Interest Security Scanner is installedCheck system for presence of Weka Interest Security Scanner executable or installation directory. Look for program files, common installation paths, or use system inventory tools to enumerate installed security software.Affected if The software is found installed on the system
-
Confirm the installed version is 1.8Locate the application executable or version information file (typically via About dialog, version property, or version info in executable metadata). Compare the version number to the affected range.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.8
-
Verify HTTP Handler component is configuredExamine application configuration files, registry entries, or service settings to determine if the HTTP Handler module is enabled. Look for HTTP listener configurations, web service settings, or handler mappings within the application.Affected if HTTP Handler component is present and enabled in the application configuration
-
Check for application crash logs or instabilityReview application event logs, crash dumps, or error logs for recent incidents involving the Weka Interest Security Scanner, particularly those mentioning HTTP Handler failures or unexpected termination.Affected if Recent crash events or denial of service symptoms related to the HTTP Handler are logged
The system is affected if Weka Interest Security Scanner version 1.8 is installed with the HTTP Handler component enabled, as this specific version and configuration is vulnerable to denial of service via manipulated HTTP input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedSince the product is no longer supported, migrate to a currently maintained security scanner solution. If continued use is mandatory, restrict local access to the application and implement network-level controls to limit exposure.
- This vulnerability affects WEKA INTEREST Security Scanner 1.8, which is explicitly noted as 'no longer supported by the maintainer' in the official description.
- No fixed version, patch, or upgrade path is provided in the available CVE description.
- Since the product is end-of-life and unsupported, the recommended remediation is to replace it with an actively maintained alternative security scanner.
- If continued use is mandatory, isolate the affected system and restrict local access to minimize exploit impact, though this is not a full remediation.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-20011 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-20011 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data