Interest Security ScannerApplication · Weka

CVE-2017-20014

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-03-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.8 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in WEKA INTEREST Security Scanner up to 1.8. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component Webspider. The manipulation with an unknown input leads to denial of service. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. NOTE: This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Local attackers can cause denial of service in the Webspider component of WEKA INTEREST Security Scanner (up to version 1.8) through unknown manipulation. The vulnerability requires local access and a public exploit exists.

MitigationSince the product is no longer supported by the maintainer, migrate to a currently supported security scanner alternative or implement compensating controls such as network segmentation and access restrictions if continued use is unavoidable.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Interest Security ScannerApplication
Affected:<= 1.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Weka Interest Security Scanner is installed
    Search system for the Weka Interest Security Scanner application or check software inventory/list of installed programs
    Affected if The software is present on the system and is the Weka Interest Security Scanner product
  2. Identify installed version
    Locate the software version information through its UI, about dialog, or version file within the installation directory
    Affected if The installed version is 1.8 or any version lower than 1.8 (e.g., 1.7, 1.6, etc.)
  3. Check if Webspider component is configured or active
    Examine the Webspider component settings within the scanner configuration or verify if the Webspider module is loaded/running
    Affected if The Webspider component is enabled, configured, or actively used within the scanner

User is affected if Weka Interest Security Scanner version 1.8 or lower is installed AND the Webspider component is enabled or in use on the local system.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.8
Interim mitigation

Since the product is no longer supported by the maintainer, migrate to a currently supported security scanner alternative or implement compensating controls such as network segmentation and access restrictions if continued use is unavoidable.

Recommended fix High confidence
  1. This product is no longer supported by the maintainer according to the official CVE description
  2. Consider migrating to an alternative security scanning solution that is actively maintained
Caveat Product is discontinued; no upgrade path available - migration to alternative solution required

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Interest Security Scanner Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-20014 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-20014 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data