CVE-2017-3066
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe ColdFusion 2016 Update 3 and earlier, ColdFusion 11 update 11 and earlier, ColdFusion 10 Update 22 and earlier have a Java deserialization vulnerability in the Apache BlazeDS library. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe ColdFusion versions 10, 11, and 2016 contain a Java deserialization vulnerability in the included Apache BlazeDS library. Attackers can exploit this by sending specially crafted serialized Java objects to vulnerable endpoints, leading to arbitrary code execution on the affected server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0= 11.0= 2016CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ColdFusion installationLocate the ColdFusion installation directory. On Windows, common paths are C:\ColdFusion2016\, C:\ColdFusion11\, or C:\ColdFusion10\. On Linux/Unix, look in /opt/coldfusion/ or /opt/ColdFusion/.Affected if Adobe ColdFusion is not installed on the system.
-
Check ColdFusion version via administratorAccess the ColdFusion Administrator interface at /cfide/administrator/ and view the System Information page, or check the version.xml file in the lib directory of the installation.Affected if The installed version is 2016 Update 3 or earlier, 11 Update 11 or earlier, or 10 Update 22 or earlier.
-
Check version from command lineRun the ColdFusion version checker if available, or examine the manifest file in the ColdFusion installation directory for the exact update level.Affected if The reported version falls within the affected ranges (10.x up to Update 22, 11.x up to Update 11, or 2016 up to Update 3).
-
Verify BlazeDS endpoint exposureCheck if the BlazeDS endpoint is accessible by attempting to access /flex/amf/ or /messagebroker/amf on the ColdFusion server via HTTP/HTTPS.Affected if The BlazeDS endpoint is exposed and accepts AMF (Action Message Format) requests without authentication.
The system is affected if Adobe ColdFusion version 10, 11, or 2016 is installed with an update level at or below the thresholds (Update 22, Update 11, or Update 3 respectively) AND the BlazeDS endpoint is accessible over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the appropriate ColdFusion update (ColdFusion 2016 Update 4+, ColdFusion 11 Update 12+, or ColdFusion 10 Update 23+) to patch the vulnerable BlazeDS library. Consider network segmentation and disabling unnecessary BlazeDS endpoints as additional hardening.
ColdFusion 10 Update 23 or later; ColdFusion 11 Update 12 or later; ColdFusion 2016 Update 4 or later; or migrate to the latest ColdFusion release (2021/2023)
- 1. Identify your current ColdFusion version and update level by accessing the ColdFusion Administrator console or checking the version.txt file in the installation directory.
- 2. For ColdFusion 10 users: Apply Update 23 or later, which includes the security patch for the BlazeDS deserialization vulnerability.
- 3. For ColdFusion 11 users: Apply Update 12 or later, which includes the security patch for the BlazeDS deserialization vulnerability.
- 4. For ColdFusion 2016 users: Apply Update 4 or later, which includes the security patch for the BlazeDS deserialization vulnerability.
- 5. Alternatively, consider upgrading to the latest available ColdFusion version for your product line to ensure all security patches are applied.
- 6. After applying the update, restart the ColdFusion application server services.
- 7. Verify the update was successful by checking the ColdFusion Administrator or version information.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,368.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-3066 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-3066 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data