CVE-2017-3812
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the implementation of Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) functionality in Cisco Industrial Ethernet 2000 Series Switches could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition due to a system memory leak. More Information: CSCvc54788. Known Affected Releases: 15.2(5.4.32i)E2. Known Fixed Releases: 15.2(5.4.62i)E2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory leak vulnerability exists in the Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) implementation on Cisco Industrial Ethernet 2000 Series Switches. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this to cause a denial of service condition by exhausting system memory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 15.2\(5.4.32i\)e2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device modelLog into the switch CLI and run 'show version' or check the physical device label to verify the model is Cisco Industrial Ethernet 2000 Series SwitchAffected if Device is not a Cisco IE 2000 Series Switch
-
Check firmware versionRun 'show version' in the switch CLI and locate the firmware version string (typically displayed as something like 15.2(x.xxxi)Ex)Affected if Firmware version is 15.2(5.4.32i)e2 or any version prior to 15.2(5.4.62i)E2
-
Verify CIP protocol statusRun 'show running-config' or 'show cip status' (if available) to check if Common Industrial Protocol is enabled on any interfaceAffected if CIP is enabled on one or more interfaces
The environment is affected if the device is a Cisco IE 2000 Series Switch running firmware version 15.2(5.4.32i)e2 or earlier with CIP protocol enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Cisco IE 2000 switches to firmware version 15.2(5.4.62i)E2 or later. As a compensating control, restrict network access to CIP-enabled interfaces to prevent unauthorized remote exploitation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-3812 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-3812 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data